By Pascal Okeke

AT the conclusion of the April 2011 general elections it was considered expedient to have three election petitions tribunals established for Anambra state. The state thus became the only one throughout the federation with three election petition tribunals. The reason for this is simple, about seventy petitions were filed by aggrieved politicians in the state following the conduct of the elections. This is so in order to allow for speedy trial of the petitions since the new Electoral Act 2010 as amended prescribed a timeline of one hundred and eighty days within which every petition should be disposed of at the tribunal.

Not many were surprised to hear recently that one of the tribunals sitting at Awka has been dissolved. It was a relief being expected with high hopes, a development which was long overdue given the type of judgments reeling out from that tribunal christened Election Petitions Tribunal I.

Sometime in May, during its inaugural press briefing, the chairman of the tribunal, Hon Justice U. B. Bwala, had warned sternly that members of the public especially parties to the petitions pending before it for determination should stay away from members of the tribunal who also include Justice I. T. Cocodia and Justice Adaigbe. He promised that the team was in Anambra to render justice, stating that he and his colleagues were incorrigible and would not want to be stained with bribery by overzealous and desperate politicians in Anambra.  It was on this kind of note that the tribunal settled down to do its work at Awka.

The warning was apt and came at a time the people of Anambra were full of expectations that the tribunal would indeed deliver justice, although it was received with mixed feelings by close watchers including pressmen who were present at the briefing. Pessimists on the other hand had instantly dismissed the warning as one coming from a tribunal that was morally and ethically empty, and therefore merely trying to impress people with a nonexistent conscience. To some others, caution was the watch word as not everything that glitters is gold. This is because of the level of notoriety some dubious individuals in the state have attained in trying to induce and allure judicial officers engaged in the settlement of election petitions in the past.

It is a saying that whenever a bird flaps its wings, it is a indication of where it is going to perch. Barely had the tribunal taken off did its bent and partiality become manifest. For instance, over a dozen petitions before it were said to have been struck out on flimsy excuses bothering on denial of jurisdiction by tribunal, inconsistency of judgments, acquiescence to alleged lack of petitioners’ locus standi, refusal to disqualify itself from continuing with matters as expressly applied for by parties, etc.

In fact, this impunity and unbridled striking out of petitions happened even before they could get to pretrial stage. Tongues started wagging as to the propriety or otherwise of the tribunal’s rulings. It became glaring that something was amiss especially when compared with rulings in similar matters from their counterpart tribunals in  both Anambra and other states of the federation as reported in the media.

Curiously, one is compelled to ask if Anambra State must always dominate in the pool of notorious and antisocial cum political quagmire in the country.  Within the past ten years, the state has set enviable records in various fields of crime and fraud which have often claimed high profile and prominent individuals as victims.

About two weeks ago, the media was awash with allegations of irregular practices by the tribunal. There was apprehension and worry that the tribunal has been compromised. It was noted that delivery of ruling which the tribunal gives in a matter of minutes takes over two weeks to be produced in print.

The implication of this is that an adverse party would lack sufficient time to put the records of the proceedings together for an appeal.  This is happening in an election petition that is bound by timeline.  It was a practice that has never happened in any other law court but only in Anambra State; a deliberate frustration that has bedeviled many petitions before now.

The latest development, the sacking of the tribunal, one would say is a good development. However, must it stop at this?  Regrettably, the tribunal has handed down its rulings on the affected petitions and caused the damage. What will happen to the cases that were already mishandled or misjudged? How to reconstruct and remedy the situation should be the ultimate challenge.

It will be nice to investigate the members and their accomplices further, and to apply the appropriate sanctions as prescribed by law, including but not limited to dismissal from service. Should there actually be any proven case of bribery, then the givers and the takers should be made to face the full force of law. With the judiciary considered to be the bastion of hope of the common man, nothing can be more criminal and as painful as perverting the cause of judicial process by officers at the temple of justice.

Although the present case is not new, what will be new probably is the result of the action already taken by Justice Salami, especially at this time the image of the judiciary is yawning for laundering and redemption. We shall wait to see how this seeming virus that ate deep into the Anambra State Election Petitions Tribunal I would not have infected the other existing ones, or indeed, even the Appeal Court in Enugu.

*Engr Pascal Okeke can be reached on 07082706478 and [email protected].