Brazil’s foreign affairs ministry’s lead climate negotiator Leonardo Cleaver de Athayde (2R) speaks with Vice-Prime Minister and Environment Minister for Democratic Republic of Congo, Eve Bazaiba Masudi (R) and Daniel Simanjunta (L), from Indonesias delegation, before a plenary United Nations Biodiversity Conference (COP15) in Montreal, Quebec, on December 19, 2022. (Photo by Lars Hagberg / AFP)
Countries reached a historic deal on Monday to reverse decades of environmental destruction threatening the world’s species and ecosystems, in what the UN chief hailed as “a peace pact with nature.”
After the marathon COP 15 biodiversity summit in Montreal ran into the small hours, chair Chinese Environment Minister Huang Runqiu, declared the deal adopted and banged his gavel, sparking loud applause.
“We are finally starting to forge a peace pact with nature,” UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said, hailing the accord.
EU chief Ursula von der Leyen said the deal was a “foundation for global action on biodiversity, complementing the Paris Agreement for Climate.”
And the United States hailed the outcome as a “turning point,” voicing appreciation for the role of frequent adversary China. State Department spokesman Ned Price called the deal “sweeping and ambitious.”
American President Joe Biden supports the deal and has launched his own “30 by 30” plan domestically, but the United States is not formally a party to the biodiversity convention because of opposition by Republicans in Congress.
After four years of fraught negotiations, more than 190 other states rallied behind the Chinese-brokered accord aimed at saving Earth’s lands, oceans and species from pollution, degradation and the climate crisis.
“We have in our hands a package which I think can guide us all to work together to hold and reverse biodiversity loss, to put biodiversity on the path of recovery for the benefit of all people in the world,” Huang told the assembly.
He overruled an objection from the Democratic Republic of Congo, which had refused to back the text, demanding greater funding for developing countries.
– Biggest conservation deal ever –
The deal pledges to secure 30 percent of the planet as a protected zone by 2030, stump up $30 billion in yearly conservation aid for the developing world and halt human-caused extinctions of threatened species.
Environmentalists have compared it to the landmark plan to limit global warming to 1.5C under the Paris agreement, though some warned that it did not go far enough.
Brian O’Donnell of the Campaign for Nature called it “the largest land and ocean conservation commitment in history.”
“The international community has come together for a landmark global biodiversity agreement that provides some hope that the crisis facing nature is starting to get the attention it deserves,” he said.
“Moose, sea turtles, parrots, rhinos, rare ferns and ancient trees, butterflies, rays, and dolphins are among the million species that will see a significantly improved outlook for their survival and abundance if this agreement is implemented effectively.”
The CEO of campaign group Avaaz, Bert Wander, cautioned: “It’s a significant step forward in the fight to protect life on Earth, but on its own it won’t be enough. Governments should listen to what science is saying and rapidly scale up ambition to protect half the Earth by 2030.”
– Indigenous rights –
The text pledges to safeguard the rights of Indigenous people as stewards of their lands, a key demand of campaigners.
But observers noted it pulled punches in other areas — for example, only encouraging businesses to report their biodiversity impacts rather than mandating them to do so.
The 23 targets in the accord also include saving hundreds of billions of dollars by cutting environmentally destructive farming subsidies, reducing the risk from pesticides and tackling invasive species.
– Funding fight –
At times, the talks looked at risk of collapsing as countries squabbled over money.
How much the rich countries will send to the developing world, home to most of the planet’s biodiversity, was the biggest sticking point.
Developing countries had been seeking the creation of a new, bigger fund for aid from the Global North. But the draft text instead suggested a compromise: creating a fund under the existing Global Environment Facility (GEF).
That concern was echoed by the Democratic Republic of Congo, home to the Congo Basin, a rich haven of biodiversity.
Current financial flows for nature to the developing world are estimated at around $10 billion per year.
A DRC delegate spoke up in the plenary to demand annual funding rise to $100 billion — but Huang declared the framework passed, angering DRC’s allies.
Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of Vanguard newspapers or any employee thereof.