By KWAME OPOKU
According to Ekpo Eyo, “It is indeed unfortunate that so much Nok material has been looted over time to supply the international market. Properly excavated, such pieces might have shed valuable light on the Nok culture.
Recent report in the home page of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) and Live Science, that Nigerian Nok sculptures, illegally exported from the country and seized by the US authorities (Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) at the John F. Kennedy Airport, New York, has raised a lot of questions.
The said works , allegedly stolen from the National Museum was said to have been handed over to the Nigerian Consul-General, Habib Baba Habu, in a repatriation ceremony.
The works numbering about ten Nok sculptures with life span of over 2000 years old and an ivory tusk were given to the Nigerian official.
In his response at the repatriation ceremony, the Nigerian Consul General is reported to have said with respect to the many Nok sculptures that are abroad that:
“Many of them are at museums all over the world, some were taken out legally.”
The Diplomat also said that the items were stolen from the national museum in Nigeria, but that, “There is no report of the items being stolen so now the director-general of the Nigerian museum and antiquities is now being subjected to an investigation.”
This recent recurrence of the illegal trafficking of Nigerian and in fact African artefacts has again called for action on the part of government to evolve a more legitimate platform with which illegal trafficking of the country’s heritage can be checked.
We have commented
several times elsewhere about the manifold issues involved in the illegal exportation of these sculptures which are considered to be very important for the history of Nigeria and therefore are on ICOM’s Red List of artefacts that should under no circumstances leave Nigeria. There have been persistent allegations that some Nigerian officials may have been involved in the illegal export of Nok terracotta and the Nigerian Consul-General has stated that some officials are under investigation in connection with the export of the artefacts handed over in New York.
Stakeholders now expect of the Nigerian authorities, a full independent investigation of this matter and a public presentation of a report thereon. Also necessary would be the publication of a complete list of import authorizations given by the National Commission for Museums and Monument.
These steps will help in determining which of the Nok pieces in the West have been legally or illegally exported.
In this connection, it is clear that after the ban on exportation of Nok pieces and their inclusion on ICOM’s Red List, there could be no legal exportation of the objects.
There may be cases of legal exportation, with the permission of the National Commission on Museums and Monument, before the ban. This is very difficult to determine in the absence of a list of permission issued to date by the Commission.
There has been a ban on export of antiquities from Nigeria without permission from the authorities as far back as the 1953 Antiquities Ordinance. The relevant laws, ordinances, and decrees issued in 1969, 1974 and 1979 have been consolidated in the National Commission for Museums and Monuments Act, Chapter 242, Laws of Nigeria, 1990. Section 25 (1) of the Act provides that “no antiquity shall be exported from Nigeria without a permit issued in that behalf by the Commission.”
In view of the many Nigerian artefacts outside the country, it is remarkable that one seldom reads about list of items declared missing from the Nigerian National Museum. We also do not hear about attempts made to recover lost items through Interpol or bodies such as Art Loss Register or similar agencies. Cultural objects get lost/stolen in Nigeria but no one seems to report regularly such losses.
Also to be avoided by the
Nigerian authorities is the situation where a high official from Nigeria opens an exhibition in which looted/stolen Nigerian artefacts are among the objects displayed without an indication that they are looted artefacts.
A firm, clear and full statement from the Nigerian government on restitution matters and an indication of a determination to recover artefacts illegally exported from Nigeria would be a useful contribution to the fight against illicit traffic in artefacts from Nigeria.