By our Reporter
ABUJA – The lack of coordination between the nation’s fiscal and monetary authorities has become manifest as the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, yesterday, refused to cut interest rate, as suggested by the Minister of Finance, Mrs. Kemi Adeosun.

The Finance Minister had on Monday, called on the CBN to lower interest rate, so the government could borrow domestically to boost the economy without increasing debt servicing costs.

But Governor of the CBN, Mr.Godwin Emefiele, who briefed the press at the end of the Monetary Policy Committee, MPC, meeting in Abuja, said rate cuts in the past did not result in banks giving credits to the real sectors of agriculture and manufacturing as instructed.

He said a cut in the rate at a time inflation was rising could worsen the nation’s economic situation.

Emefiele said: “Whereas the Minister of Finance has called for a reduced interest rate at this time, the MPC decides otherwise.

Minister of Finance, Mrs. Kemi Adeosun and  Governor of the CBN, Mr.Godwin Emefiele,
Minister of Finance, Mrs. Kemi Adeosun and Governor of the CBN, Mr.Godwin Emefiele,

“Basically, like I said, both the monetary and fiscal authorities have the intention to achieve growth, but the direction through which we want to achieve it may differ as long as you still achieve the growth.

“The issues here, just as we have read in the communique, is that when you say reduce the interest rate, there are two possibilities here.
“You are saying because you want that to push credit to the private sector at lower rate, or two which I have had the fiscal authorities talk about, is to be able to borrow at lower rates and spend.

“Our view at the MPC, which was exhaustively discussed, was that in the past, there was a time when MPC decided, not only to reduce the policy rate, but, indeed, also increased the Cash Reserve.
Past rate cuts channeled to traders

“These were intended to lower rates and encourage spending, particularly to the private sector. After we did that, because we did not see the impact of credit to the private sector, we needed to further redo the CRR. During that first section, we reduced the CRR from 30.5 to 25%.

“It provided an opportunity for about N1trillion to be injected by the CBN into the economy or made available to the banks.
“But rather than loan this mony to the banks or loan them to the consumers, or agriculture and manufacturers, like we said in the communique, we found that those credit went to traders, who used them to demand for foreign exchange, which ended up putting pressure on the foreign exchange market. That was what happened.

“Subsequent to that, we said since this money wasn’t deployed directly, we would also be reducing the CRR, then from 25% to where it is right now, which is 22.5%. That was going to provide between N350 billon and N500 billion through that avenue.

“But we said we are not going to allow the banks to really have the cash until they send proposals to the CBN for primary agric projects, new manufacturing projects and other projects that will spur industrial capacity and manufacturing output.

“I must confess that the proposals we received were mainly for the purpose of refinancing the liquidity of the banks and we thought that was not what we wanted and that is the reason we have been a little circumspect about raising some of these liquidities.

“But we are looking at the books and very few of them that have submitted proposals for agric, new manufacturing projects will be considered in due course.
“The second part of it was that yes, if you lower interest rate, what that will do is that it will make it possible for the fiscal authorities to borrow at lower rates.

“We are saying fine, if they borrow at lower rate, it simulates spending, what that does is that it simulates demands for goods by providing cash or money to be spent without taking actions to boost industrial capacity.

“When you take actions to boost manufacturing output, what happens is that you will see a situation where you have too much money chasing too few goods, which will also worsen the inflationary condition in which we are now.

FX inflow above $1 b since July

“That is why we are saying the option that we will like to adopt is, while the fiscal is going ahead to spend, what we want to do is retain the rates where they are.
“When you say retain the rates where they are, you are saying you want to defend a tight situation so that it will again, as we said at the last meeting, encourage the inflow of capital.

“But I was not that optimistic, but today, I can report that I am looking optimistic because between July and now, we have seen inflow of foreign exchange (FX) of above $1 billion.”

Emefiele said he was hopeful that with the improved inflow of foreign exchange into the country, the value of the nation’s currency would soon rise to the benefit of the economy.

He, however, said the economy was still faced with “elevated risks on both price and output fronts.”

All monetary policy instruments were retained at their current levels. Monetary Policy Rate, MPR, at 14 per cent, Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) at 22. 5 per cent; Liquidity Ratio at 30 per cent and asymmetric window at +200 and -500 basis points around the MPR.

Subscribe for latest Videos


Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of vanguard newspapers or any employee thereof.