By Okey Nderibe, who was in Addis-Ababa, Ethiopia
The recent meeting of African Heads of State and Government in Ethiopian where the Libyan leader, Moammer Ghaddafi, stepped down as African Union (AU) chairman was full of diplomatic manouvres.
Last month’s 14th  Assembly of African Heads of State and Government which took place in Addis-Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia, was characterized by high drama.
However, the most visible of the dramatic incidents was the decision of Libyan leader and immediate past chairman of the continental body, Col. Moammer Ghaddafi, to suddenly amend the programme for the opening ceremony of the summit by inviting some traditional rulers to address the Assembly of African leaders.
The two representatives of African monarchs, who were simply introduced as representatives of the kings and princes of Africa by Ghaddafi, were dressed in heavy traditional African regalia.
The representatives of African kings and princes told leaders of the continent that the Association of Kings and Princes of Africa was established by Gaddafi for the pursuit of peace in the continent, stressing that the group was not interested in politics.
He said the group had already contributed in the promotion of peace in Africa citing the role played by the association in restoring peace in Cote D’Ivoire as example of the role the group could play in conflict situations across the continent. He maintained that Africa could only grow through promotion of the continent’s culture.
Referring to Gaddafi whom he described as “ King of Kings of Africa†the spokesperson for African monarchs thanked Gaddafi for giving the group recognition during his tenure as chairperson of the African Union.
He reminded African leaders that many of the continent’s member states would soon mark their 50th anniversary as independent nations adding that this was a period for stock-taking and evaluation for the continent.
He also praised Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni as another African leader who had recognised the group’s role as important in the continent. He maintained that there was need for African leaders to change their attitude towards the traditional institutions in their various countries, adding that “ although African traditional rulers of the past era did not have good western education, there are traditional rulers in the continent today who are intellectualsâ€.
In his own speech earlier, Gadaffi warned that Africa faced the danger of being re-colonised if the continent did not unite. He also expressed disappointment over the intrigues and manoeuvres that characterized the election of his successor as leader of the continental body.
Gaddafi’s proposal to go for a second term (backed by Tunisia, some Western and Central African countries) had caused a stir particularly amongst Southern African nations who had nominated the Malawian president to succeed Gaddafi.
The chairmanship for the continental body rotates each year on  regional basis and the 14th member Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) had been challenged by Tunisia’s proposal that Libya’s term be extended.
Some member states had expressed fear that the move might split the union into two camps; those for Tunisia’s proposal and those who argued that the AU should respect its own rules and regulations. Gaddafi had, in his remark before stepping down, called for a strong and established new mechanism for African Union that will build the United States of Africa militarily, economically, socially and culturally.
“We are a very rich continent, we have huge potentials, we have human resources but the challenges are also there unfortunately. They are huge but we have to be together otherwise we will be colonised againâ€, the Libyan leader said.
He continued: “We have three powers whose names I will not mention. But they are competing over Africa be it economically or by exploiting our resources or even militarily. Therefore we have to be aware of that. Any vacuum or void in Africa will be beneficial to themâ€.
Apparently to make it known that he did not need the AU platform to continue to lead and contribute to the contigent, the Libyan leader said his country will host the Afro-Arab Summit in Libya this month and Libya will head the body for one year, adding that there will be other summits before the end of the year.
Indications that something was amiss within the continental body became obvious when the Assembly of Heads of State and Government, which was supposed to kick off at 9 in the morning, was delayed for closed to two hours.
The initial programme had indicated that the opening session was to end by 9.30 am.
The programme had also indicated that immediately after the opening ceremony, Heads of State would move to the lobby of the United Nations Conference Centre -where the conference was supposed to hold for the launch of the African Union flag. The next item on the agenda was supposed to be taking of group photographs and then the inauguration of the Exhibition on Information and Communication Technology.
The second session of the meeting of the Assembly of Heads of State was supposed to be a closed door session which ought to begin by 9.30 am and end by 10. Then Heads of State and Government were supposed to proceed to Committee room one for consultation and the composition of the Communique Drafting Committee. But for reasons that were not explained, the entire programme changed.
Apparently to prevent journalists from observing what was going on, they were denied access to the press gallery for close to an hour. Later, the press men were allowed into the gallery but hardly had they sat down than they were ordered out again by Ethiopian Security Service personnel. The crowd of journalists were asked to relocate to another hall. They were left there for a while before information trickled in that other journalists had began assembling at the entrance to the gallery.
Indeed, there appeared a strong determination on the part of the security personnel- who were in-charge of security at the United Nations Economic Commission for African ( UNECA) building venue of the summit- to frustrate journalists from covering the event by wearing them out. They were kept waiting for about one hour without seats. But the journalists too were prepared to endure.

Disclaimer
Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of Vanguard newspapers or any employee thereof.