Breaking News
Translate

Fate or freedom? Blaming spirits, outsourcing responsibility

Kindly Share This Story:

By Fr George Adimike

Is human existence a progressive unfolding of a predetermined pattern of actions and   inactions?In other words, does   spirit   control   people   like   a   robot?   Are Christians   compliant   to   Christ-like   freedom   or   robot-similar   determinism? Answering these questions  launches   one   into investigating the delicate   balance between fate and freedom central to questions of ethics, civics and metaphysics.

It delves into an adequate understanding of human identity, involving anthropology and theology. In other words, it opens the whole spectrum of man to a vista of understanding within the context of his fatal orientation. Therefore, it speaks to freedom and determinism and places them adequately relative to man. As such, in responding   to   the   questions:Is   man   free   or   determined?   Is   he   depraved   or deprived? It addresses the possibility of our participation in our salvation.

Did God create us into the likeness of His son’s freedom of the will or image of divine   robots   in   God-ordained   determinism?   The   question   of   freedom   and determinism   has   been   a   perennial   issue   in   the   history   of   thought,   leading   to exaggerating one over the other. It is not uncommon to behold people who, to safeguard God’s sovereignty and gratuitousness of salvation, attenuate freedom of the will, thus inadvertently deleting responsibility.

The denial or reduction of the role   of   liberty   of   the   will   destroys   the   basis   for   morality   and   ethics   and,   by implication, frees one from any personal responsibility for his or her actions and delinks human actions from merit or blame. In other words, acts that deny freedom of the will rob the subject of full dignity as a child of God and degenerates to robot-similar determinism.

In reality, man’s material and spiritual dimensions are well integrated that he is the subject   of   his   actions   and   takes   blame   or   praise   for   them.   Unfortunately,   the intersection of Calvinist theology and responsibility-dodging culture has planted seeds   of   confusion   in   appreciating   proper   Christian   anthropology.   Thusly,   it distorted   the   theology   of   man’s   salvation   and   wrongly   considered   man   totally depraved.

This responsibility-dodging culture manifests itself in outsourcing responsibility for human faults to spirits. Generally, the spirit of lies, the spirit of pride, the spirit of fornication,the spirit of this and the spirit of that, are blamed for bad behaviours. Without denying the role of principalities in human sin, regrettably, many ignorant preachers reinforce the wrong attribution of human faults to spirits. This wrong attribution of faults removes responsibility from humans, implying that no one is praise or blameworthy.

In reality, virtues and vices are functions of the will in the use of freedom. But this human will can be affected by habit—a pattern of choices. In fact, habits are second nature—vices or virtues can become so indigenised that we perform them with  facility. Through repeated   acts,  they  become  character and  condition  life. Hence, vices blamed on spirits are vices not rooted out at their incipient moments that they became part of the subject’s nature. One of the reasons to appreciate the impact of habits is the recognition that phenotype impacts one’s actions profoundly as much as genotype.

[ALSO READ] Brazil reports 3,650 dead from Covid in one day

The environment the moral ecosystem can be so charged with a particular texture of life that it becomes a great force pulling one to its execution. The combination of genotype and phenotype can have a compelling influence. Yet, sin is not in the DNA. The phenotypic influence can be so gripping that one feels incapable of breaking the shackles, and consequently, surrender and blame spirits rather than resorting to behavioural change that involves discipline and discipleship.

Assuredly, formation breaks the yoke  because since everyone possesses   reason   and   freedom,   all   have   a   real   possibility   of   positive   change,transformation, and salvation. The scriptures are replete with passages that accentuate either predestination or responding to salvation in freedom. Unfortunately, these passages have either been read in opposition to or in forgetfulness of their counterparts. But these passages should be properly read as a unit within the context of the whole message of the Bible.

This has characterized the church’s reading of the Bible from the earliest antiquity, where the fathers employed the hermeneutics of faith and unity. Hence, predestination stands in concord with freedom. God’s salvation is not an arbitrary exercise   in   which  He   chose  people   randomly  to   be   saved   while   others   to   be damned.   Rather,   He   predestined   before   the   foundation   of   the   world   to   save whomsoever that freely responds in faith. As such, predestination is in intercourse with   freedom. God’s   omnipotence   grants   man   the   freedom   to   work   out   his salvation cautiously, knowing that he can lose his predestination.

Again, the point is that God’s foreknowledge (cf. Rom 8:28-29) does not imply fore-ordination. A Christian is never starved of grace to overcome a challenge. In the interplay of predestination and freedom, man retains the possibility of choice,the power to revise or to rewrite his autobiography. There exists a real capacity to relate with his creator; he possesses a real possibility of demonstrating the divine quality as a creature by progressively growing in grace. Without this possibility, no one can really do anything relative to eternal destiny, making righteous living a scam. But because  of the  possibility, one can  grow in   or  lose  salvation.

It all depends on the use of freedom, which is not a fantasy but a real quality God offers man. The true elect, predestined and chosen, are those who, in their use of freedom,chose rightly and persevered in their choices through grace (cf. Rom 1:16). God,who wants all to be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth (cf. 1 Tim 2:4),who does not want anyone to be lost (cf. 2 Peter 3:9) and who does not want the death of evil people but rather that they repent and live (cf. Ezekiel 18:23), is unlikely   to   predestine   someone   for   destruction.

God’s   foreknowledge   is   quite different   from   God’s   predetermination,   which   justifiably   obviates   every responsibility. That the Lord so loved the world that WHOMSOEVER believed will be saved (cf. Jn 3:16) puts the accent on the free choice. Hence, the parable of the prodigal son (cf. Luke 15) emphasizes this point of choosing rightly. These passages will make no meaning if predestination is understood as God arbitrarily choosing those to be saved, in which case whatever they do adds no value since their salvation is irreversible.

That God foreknew that whoever succumbs to the allurement   of   sin   and   fails   to   use   freedom   well   will   be   damned   does   not approximate being predestined for destruction. Our salvation is by God’s grace, but its subjective appropriation is a function of free choice. Hence, in this vanishingly little  time on  earth,  humans   are   responsible   for   their   good   or  bad actions  and should not blame anonymous spirits as the culprits.

Vanguard News Nigeria

Kindly Share This Story:
All rights reserved. This material and any other digital content on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from VANGUARD NEWS.

Disclaimer

Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of vanguard newspapers or any employee thereof.
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!