The White House on Wednesday said it sees the perpetrator of a deadly attack in New York an “enemy combatant,” opening the door to his detention without normal rights.

“I think the actions he took certainly justify that,” White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said, adding that a final determination had not been made.

Investigators inspect a truck following a shooting incident in New York on October 31, 2017.
Several people were killed and numerous others injured in New York on Tuesday after a vehicle plowed into a pedestrian and bike path in Lower Manhattan, police said. “The vehicle struck multiple people on the path,” police tweeted. “The vehicle continued south striking another vehicle. The suspect exited the vehicle displaying imitation firearms & was shot by NYPD.” / AFP PHOTO

The designation would mean 29-year-old suspect Sayfullo Saipov could be denied access to a lawyer and detained indefinitely without charge.

It could also open the door to military justice and transfer to the prison at Guantanamo Bay, something Donald Trump said he was willing to consider earlier Wednesday.

After the 9/11 attacks, the “enemy combatant” designation was used to detain hundreds of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay and sites in the greater Middle East.

But amid great controversy, it was the subject of a Supreme Court ruling and would later be abandoned by then President Barack Obama, although some of the provisions would be kept in place.

Supporters say it allows the authorities to detain potentially dangerous terror suspects.

Senator John McCain called for the administration to use the designation.

“We must not consider these attacks on our homeland in isolation, but rather recognize them for what they are: acts of war,” he said.

“As soon as possible, the administration should notify Congress how it plans to proceed with the interrogation and trial of this suspect.”

Critics say it is unconditional, erodes individuals’ rights and the rule of law, and is open to abuse.


Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of vanguard newspapers or any employee thereof.