Lagos – A Federal High Court in Lagos on Tuesday fixed Jan. 20, 2017 to commence trial of Haruna Jauro, former Acting Director-General of Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA), facing N304.1 million fraud charges.

Jauro is standing trial alongside Dauda Bawa and Thlumbau Enterprises Ltd on 19-count charge brought against them by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

They were arraigned on April 12, and had pleaded not guilty to the charges, while the court had admitted them to bail in the sum of five million naira each with two sureties each in like sum.

When the case was called on Tuesday, counsel to Jauro, Mr Olalekan Ojo, informed the court that the plea bargain earlier opted for by the accused had broken down and that he was ready to proceed with the trial.

Hand over: Barrister Calistus Nwabueze Obi (r) and handing over to Mr. Haruna Baba Jauro, as  Acting Director General/Chief Executive Officer.
Hand over: Barrister Calistus Nwabueze Obi (r) and handing over to Mr. Haruna Baba Jauro, as Acting Director General/Chief Executive Officer.

Ojo objected when EFCC’s counsel, Mr Nkereuwem Anana attempted to lead his witness, Mr Orji Chukwuma, in evidence.

He said the prosecution did not serve his client with the witness statement as required by law prior to commencement of trial.

The prosecutor admitted that the witness’ statement was not served on the defence, saying it was due to an oversight and prayed for an adjournment to enable him to follow the due process.

Consequently, Justice Mojisola-Olatoregun fixed Jan. 20, 2017 for continuation of trial.
Jauro assumed leadership of NIMASA after ex-Director General of the agency, Patrick Akpobolokemi.

Akpobolokemi is also being prosecuted alongside others for alleged multi-billion naira fraud.

The EFCC accused Jauro and others of conspiring among themselves to defraud NIMASA of N304.1m between January 2014 and September 2015.

The anti-graft agency said the accused converted the money to their personal use.

The prosecution further told the court that the offence contravened the provisions of section 15 (1) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) (Amendment) Act, 2012.

Subscribe to our youtube channel

Disclaimer

Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of vanguard newspapers or any employee thereof.