By Hugo Odiogor & Johnbosco Agbakwuru
NIGERIANS have called on the Federal Government to assemble experts with legal, diplomatic and historial expertise to study the fresh facts that have emerged showing that International Court of Justice (ICJ) was misled into ceding the Bakassi peninsula to Cameroun when vital informations that clearly placed Bakassi as a territory within the geographical, political and administrative jurisdiction and control of Nigeria, were concealed to the jurists of the World Court.

International relations experts, renowned historians, researchers and politicians told Vanguard newspaper that contrary to the claims by Cameroon and Nigerian legal teams that the first legal treaty on the Land and Maritime borders between Nigerian and Cameroon was the 1913 Anglo-German treaty, there are discoveries of fresh facts that revealed that the limits of the Land and maritime boundaries between both countries went as far back as 1811 when the British made the treaty that went from the Lake Chad region down to the Atlantic ocean through the Rio Del Rey Estuary.

The Great Fraud

1. There are evidence to show that in 1994 when a new dispute erupted between Nigeria and Cameroon, Nigeria asked the British government to attest to the true status of Bakassi Peninsula, the British government replied to assert that the Peninsula belongs to Nigeria.

2. This was when Alhaji Babagana Kingibe was Nigeria’s Minister of External Affairs but curiously that document was not tendered at the ICJ trial.

BAKASSI INDIGENES PROTEST MARGINALISATION—Senator Florence Ita Giwa, flanked by Bakassi indigenes, displaying their voters’ cards while protesting marginalisation by the Federal Government at the Nigeria Television Authority, NTA, premises, Victoria Island, Lagos, yesterday.

3. There are fresh evidence to show that in the March 18, 1961, plebiscite in Southern Cameroon, to determine areas that either wanted to stay in Cameroun or join Nigeria,  Bakassi Penisula was not among the areas that participated in the exercise because it was given that it was not part of Cameroun. According to Southern Cameroun gazette Volume 7 number14,  the areas that were asked to determine where they want to belong included Mamfe, Bamenda, Kumba, and Victoria.  More importantly the people of  Bakassi have voted in Nigerian elections and the Nigerian Customs has been in control of the territorial waters since 1811.

4. The 1913 Anglo-German treaty which Cameroon rested its claim was not signed by both countries before the outbreak of the First World War in 1914.

5. Germany renounced all its terrirorial claims at the end of the war in 1919 and all the former territories controlled by Germany came under the mandate of the League of Nations

6. There are clear cases of ethnic cleansing in Bakassi peninsula in the past 10 years in violation of the Green Tree Agreement.

According to Prof. Walter Ofonagoro, who is a Historian and former Nigerian Information minister who did his Ph.D thesis on Southern Oil protectorate, “fresh facts have emerged to show that the Cameroonian legal team deceived the ICJ into believing that before the Ango-German treaty of 1913 upon which it rested its case, there were no other treaties that delineated the land and maritime boundary between Nigeria and Cameroon, which is a fraudulent claim.”

Prof. Ofonagoro said that he has “in his possession 1822 documents which vested ownership of the Bakassi Peninsula to the Old Calabar Chiefs by extension to Nigeria and debunked claims that the 1913 Anglo-German treaty was the first recongnised treaty on the land and maritime boundary between Nigeria and Cameroon. Said Prof. Ofonagoro “this is not true because as far back as 1811, the British had already established a strong sphere of influence over the territories that eventually became Nigeria in 1914. He said “the Anglo-German treaty upon which Cameroon built its case was contestible because after the First World war ended in 1919, all the  territories controlled by Germany were taken away  from them and given to the league of nations.

He said “there were other treaties between Nigeria and Cameroon on the Land and Maritime boundaries which were entered into in 1884,1885 and 1886 all of which clearly demarcated the land and Maritime border between Nigeria and Cameroon from the Lake Chad region down to the Akwa Yafe river which  was  the land border from Akwa Yafe to Rio Del Rey estuary to the Atlantic ocean.

“When the Germans got to Akwa Yafe River they discovered that they could not gain a direct access to the sea because going toward west of Akwa Yafe river will take them straight to the Calabar seaport. The Calabar Sea Port was clearly outlined in the treaty this was the main port of entry for the British merchants, and later missionaries, who were the first to establish sphere of influence in Nigeria. He said there was no way the British would have granted the Germans a boundary access that would have constrained their access to the Calabar power.

“The British were fully in control of the Calabar sea Port. The Germans went East of Akwa Yafe River, which took them to the Rio Del Rey estuary to the sea. This ensured that the Bakassi Peninsula was on the West, which put the Peninsula on the Nigerian territory. The predominant population on the Peninsula then were the Efiks and Efuts, who were of Efik kingdom which stretched up to Khumba, Victoria and Bamenda.

Grounds for appeal for review

Although the Federal Government has been reluctant to listen to the calls from the National Assembly, the Judiciary, the Nigerian Bar Association to appeal for a review, Prof. Ofonagoro said “Nigeria has very strong ground to approach the ICJ for a revision of its decision because there are concrete material facts and documentary evidence that were not before the ICJ in 2002 which would have helped to guide the world jurists in their decision”. Ofonagoro said: “If the ICJ should allow a judgment that was obtained by fraud and concealment of feet to stand, and grave in justice would have been down to the people of ICJ. The reputation of  ICJ would have been tarnished because the whole world expects it to do justice at all time.” He added that the Nigerian defence team went to the Hague to agree with the Cameroonians that before 1913, there were no other treaties between the two colonial power, which is false. But more fallacious is the fact that the Cameroon of 1919, was not the Cameroon of 1913, because after the end of the First World War, Germany was forced to give up all it territories in Africa, which came under the mandate of  League of Nations.

Senator Ewah Bassey Henshaw said: “We have evidence from the memoir of the German ambassador in 1913 who negotiated the so-called 1913 Anglo German treaty. He said the treaty was not signed because the distrust between Britain and Germany at that time and the conflict between the envoy and some officials of his own country. In 1961 when a referendum was conducted in Southern Cameroon on which part it wishes to belong after the British ended its colonial rule Bakassi Peninsula was not included by because it was regarded as part and parcel of Nigeria. In the areas such as Issangale that were included in referendum, they voted to be in Nigeria.

Speaking at the Vanguard Conference Hall in Lagos, Senator Henshaw said the ICJ has a duty to review its judgment wich gave the sovereignty of Bakassi to Cameroon because it was obtained by fraud and deceits. He said we are not asking for too much for the ICJ to take a second look at the fresh facts and our action is covered by Artcle 61 of ICJ which empowers people to come back for a review of their judgment if there are fresh facts that surfaced when the decision was made which have substantially affected the judgement. The president who has sworn on oath to defend the territorial integrity of Nigeria and the constitution should assist the people of Bakassi by asking the AGF to appeal for a review of the ICJ verdict.

Chief Maurice Ekong of Save Bakassi Group said the area has enough evidence to prove to the world and the ICJ that the people of Bakassi are being used as pawns in the power game of Africa where the indigenous people of Bakassi are being forced into perpetual slavery in Cameroon or into perpetual refugees in Nigeria, while their God given land is sacrificed by Nigeria to show gratitude to Cameroon in the spirit of brotherhood, for supporting the Federal Government to defeat Biafra. We subscribe to the unity and corporate existence of Nigeria but the price that Bakassi people are being forced to pay is too great for us to carry. We cannot carry a life time burden of servitude and impoverishment to keep Nigeria one.

According to Ekong the 1975 Maroua declaration is a justification of the fraud of 1913 and other fraudulent treaties that were entered into without seeking the opinion of Bakassi people. We have no hands in what Gowon and Obasanjo did, we were not party to the war and we would not accept to be donated as a booty of war to Cameroon or to any other party on earth.

Hon Aniefok Inynag said the people of Bakassi are making a peaceful appeal to the world to give them a listening ear. When crisis erupts in Bakassi, the entire Gulf of Guinea will be be affected. The entire projections that the 25 per cent of global oil supply will come from this region will be in jeopardy. We will have a situation similar to Pacific Ocean where Somali pirates have become a major threat to global trade and maritime.

Subscribe to our youtube channel


Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of vanguard newspapers or any employee thereof.