Viewpoint

March 21, 2025

The future of food safety lies in scientific innovation

The future of food safety lies in scientific innovation

Moses Dogho

By Moses Dogho

In an era of climate uncertainty, population growth, and globalized supply chains, ensuring food safety has become one of humanity’s most pressing challenges. Foodborne illnesses impact 600 million people yearly, costing economies over $110 billion in healthcare expenses, lost productivity, and trade disruptions. However, science provides a beacon of hope as risks increase—from antibiotic-resistant pathogens to pesticide residues. Innovations in chemical engineering, analytical chemistry, and automation are transforming how we detect contaminants, preserve food, and enforce safety standards. The future of food safety relies on leveraging these advancements while promoting collaboration among governments, industries, and research institutions. This article examines how scientific innovation, supported by interdisciplinary cooperation, can create a safer, more equitable global food system.

Emerging Technologies in Contaminant Detection

Precision Sensors and Biosensors

Traditional methods of detecting pathogens or chemicals in food—such as culturing bacteria or chromatography—are time-consuming and labor-intensive. Modern biosensors, however, deliver real-time results with unparalleled accuracy. For example:

• Nanotechnology-based sensors can identify Salmonella or E. coli in minutes by binding to pathogen-specific biomarkers.

• Smartphone-integrated devices, like the USDA’s “Food Safety Sensor,” allow farmers to test crops for aflatoxins onsite, reducing reliance on distant labs.

• DNA sequencing tools, such as CRISPR-Cas systems, are being adapted to detect foodborne viruses like norovirus in shellfish.

In 2022, a U.S.-Singapore consortium developed a graphene-based sensor capable of detecting pesticide residues at parts-per-trillion levels, a breakthrough for monitoring compliance with EU Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs).

Blockchain and AI-Driven Traceability

Blockchain technology is revolutionizing supply chain transparency. By creating immutable records of food journeys—from farm to fork—it enables rapid recalls during outbreaks. Walmart’s blockchain system, for instance, reduced traceability timelines for mangoes from seven days to two seconds.

Meanwhile, AI algorithms analyze data from IoT sensors, weather patterns, and historical recalls to predict contamination risks. IBM’s Food Trust platform uses machine learning to flag unsafe batches of leafy greens, preventing outbreaks before they occur.

CRISPR and Gene Editing

Gene-editing tools like CRISPR-Cas9 are engineering crops resistant to toxins and pathogens. Kenyan researchers recently developed a maize variety that silences fungal genes responsible for aflatoxin production. Similarly, CRISPR is being used to breed livestock resistant to diseases like African swine fever, reducing reliance on antibiotics.

Automation and Robotics in Food Production

Smart Manufacturing Systems

Automated food processing plants minimize human error, a leading cause of contamination. Robotic arms equipped with hyperspectral cameras inspect products for defects, while AI-guided sorting systems remove contaminated grains or meats. In Japan, Toyota’s robotic systems in seafood factories have reduced Vibrio contamination by 90% through precision filleting and temperature control.

Drone and Satellite Monitoring

Drones equipped with multispectral sensors monitor crop health, identifying early signs of pest infestations or mold. Satellite imagery, combined with AI, tracks soil moisture and temperature to predict mycotoxin risks in cereals. The FAO’s WaPOR portal provides real-time water productivity data, helping farmers optimize irrigation and reduce fungal growth.

3D-Printed Foods

While still nascent, 3D food printing allows precise control over ingredients, eliminating allergens or contaminants. Companies like Revo Foods use 3D printing to create plant-based seafood alternatives free of microplastics and heavy metals.

Sustainable Preservation Techniques

Advanced Packaging Solutions

Chemical engineers are designing active packaging materials that extend shelf life and inhibit pathogens:

• Oxygen-scavenging films prevent oxidation in meats.

• Edible coatings infused with thyme oil or chitosan (derived from crustacean shells) suppress bacterial growth on fruits.

• Time-temperature indicators (TTIs) change color when food exceeds safe storage conditions, alerting consumers and retailers.

In 2023, MIT researchers unveiled a cellulose-based packaging that decomposes within weeks and detects E. coli via color change.

Cold Chain Innovations

Nearly 30% of food in developing nations spoils due to inadequate refrigeration. Solar-powered cold storage units, such as India’s EcoZen, reduce post-harvest losses while maintaining safety. Phase-change materials (PCMs), which absorb heat during melting, are being integrated into transport containers to stabilize temperatures without electricity.

High-Pressure Processing (HPP) and Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF)

Non-thermal preservation methods like HPP and PEF eliminate pathogens while preserving nutrients. HPP-treated juices, popular in Europe, have a 120-day shelf life without preservatives. PEF disrupts microbial cell membranes using electric pulses, a technique now scaling in dairy industries.

Collaboration: Bridging Science, Policy, and Industry

Public-Private Partnerships

Innovation thrives when academia, governments, and corporations pool resources. The EU’s Horizon Europe program funds projects like FoodSafety4EU, which harmonizes detection methods for emerging risks. Similarly, the FDA’s Low- or No-Cost Tech Program helps small U.S. farms adopt blockchain and sensors.

Global Standardization Efforts

Divergent regulations hinder trade and safety. The Codex Alimentarius Commission, jointly run by the WHO and FAO, sets science-based standards for 188 countries. Recent updates include guidelines for nanomaterial use in food contact materials and thresholds for cannabidiol (CBD) in edibles.

Ethical AI and Data Sharing

AI’s potential is limited by fragmented data. Initiatives like the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) promote data-sharing platforms where companies anonymously upload contamination incidents, creating predictive models for global risks. However, ethical frameworks are critical to prevent misuse.

Policy Frameworks for a Safer Future

Investing in R&D

Governments must prioritize funding for food safety innovation. South Korea allocates 15% of its agricultural budget to smart farming technologies, while Canada’s Food Safety Enhancement Program subsidizes HPP adoption for SMEs.

Strengthening Regulatory Enforcement

Advanced detection tools are futile without enforcement. Rwanda’s National Agricultural Export Development Board uses handheld DNA sequencers to test export-bound coffee for ochratoxin A, ensuring compliance with EU limits. Similarly, the FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) mandates preventive controls for U.S. facilities.

Educating Consumers and Producers

Awareness bridges the gap between innovation and adoption. Kenya’s “Aflatoxin-Free Maize” campaign trains farmers on post-harvest handling, cutting contamination by 40%. Apps like FoodSwitch (Australia) scan barcodes to alert users to allergens or recalls.

Challenges and Ethical Considerations

• Cost Barriers: Smallholders often lack access to high-tech solutions.

• Data Privacy: Blockchain’s transparency risks exposing proprietary practices.

• Equity: Will innovations benefit wealthy nations disproportionately?

Conclusion: A Vision for Universal Food Safety

Scientific innovation alone cannot eradicate foodborne threats. It requires political will, equitable resource distribution, and a cultural shift toward valuing safety over profit. By investing in scalable technologies like biosensors and CRISPR, enforcing data-driven policies, and empowering vulnerable communities, we can build a future where safe food is a universal right—not a privilege. The tools exist; the time to act is now.

Moses Dogho, MSc, CQPA, a quality control expert, wrote in from the United States.