Ohanaeze

By Ike Uchechukwu

High Court sitting in Calabar, Monday adjourned hearing of a matter between parties in a tussle over the leadership of Ohaneze Ndigbo in Cross River State.

Vanguard learned that the matter came up before justice Bassey Ebuta, who adjourned it to February 24.

In charge N0: HC/82c/2022 between the Inspector General Of Police IGP, respondent and Ugoji Nwabueze Esq., defendant , the court adjourned the case for hearing till February 24.

In a motion on notice brought before the the court, counsel to defendant( Nwabueze), Prof. Jacob Dada Esq., stated that hearing of the matter could have amounted to abuse of court process.

Recall, Nwabueze (defendant) in the case was dragged to court by the Inspector General of Police, IGP, for “parading” himself and “impersonating” to be the President General of Ohaneze Ndigbo, Cross River State ,based on a petition written by a section of some Igbo leaders and allegedly sponsored by some members from a “faction” of thesame group( Ohanaze Ndigbo).

Vanguard also learned that Nwabueze, who was a Vice president of Ohaneze Ndigbo in Cross River State ,assumed the position of President General after the demise of his predecessor which was in tandem with their constitution.

READ ALSO: ECOWAS court adjourns Nigeriens’ suit on political exclusion to April 12

Findings however showed that months later some of his kinsmen wanted him to step aside alluding that he was no longer suitable for the position.

Moreso,his refusal to step aside got the “faction” infuriated and they headed to court in a bid to totally stop Nwabueze and ensure he no longer presents, address himself as President General of Ohaneze Ndigbo,Cross River state.

Speaking with journalists shortly after he matter was heard at the High court premises,Mary Slessor Avenue Calabar, Dada said due process was not followed in the “attempt” to arraign his client.

His words :”There are things which should have been done before defendant is arraigned,those things which should have been done,were not done accordingly.

“Significantly for instance,notice of trial ought to have been prepared or issued.It has not been prepared, let alone issued on the defendant.” Dada stated.

Dada who further explained why the matter could not be heard said , “There is no way the defendant who is not aware of where he will be arraigned, will make himself available,for arraignment.

“The law is that anybody accused of infraction should be given fair hearing amongst others.

“You cannot say he was given opportunity to be heard when the venue of the hearing was not known to him.”Dada stated.

However, Prosecuting Counsel, Barr. Alex Ewa, declined making any comment when he was asked to give insight into the matter.

Ohanaze Ndigbo is an apex Igbo socio cultural group in Nigeria and represents all Igbo communities both within and on the diaspora.

Vanguard News Nigeria

Subscribe for latest Videos

Disclaimer

Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of vanguard newspapers or any employee thereof.