By Elizabeth Osayande

The Chartered Institute of Taxation of Nigeria (CITN) has revealed that it was considering the legality behind the collection of Value Added Tax (VAT), and Personal Income Tax (PIT) by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), instead of state governments, following several court judgments declaring FIRS actions as unconstitutional.

This was contained in a statement by CITN Registrar and Chief Executive Officer, Adefisayo Awogbade.

Citing a judgment delivered by Justice Stephen Pam of the Federal High Court, Port Harcourt Division, Rivers State, which has gone viral in the social media, Awogbade said it was held that the Rivers State Government, and not the Federal Government, is empowered to collect VAT and PIT.

According to him, “the court held that there was no constitutional provision backing the collection of VAT, Withholding Tax, Education Tax and Technology Levy in Rivers State or any other state of the Federation by the FIRS.

“This was owing to the fact that the Federal Government is restricted by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 to taxation of incomes, profits and capital gains and these do not in any way include VAT or any other levy other than those specifically mentioned in Items 58 and 59 of the Exclusive Legislative List of the Constitution.”

Citing another case in October 2019, the statement read: “The Federal High Court, Lagos Division, in the Registered Trustees of Hotel Owners and Managers Association of Lagos v. A. G. Federation & Others while considering the validity of the Hotel Occupancy and Restaurants Consumption Law of Lagos State, upheld the powers of the Lagos State Government to charge and collect Consumption Tax from hotels, restaurants and event centres within the state.

“The Court held that based on the Constitution and the Taxes and Levies (Approved List for Collection) Act, the power to impose consumption tax was a residual power within the exclusive competence of states.

“It restrained the FIRS from imposing VAT on goods and services consumed in hotels, restaurants and event centres as this was already covered by the Lagos State Law.”

The statement equally cited the Emmanuel ChukwukaUkala v. FIRS & A.G. FEDERATION in Suit No. FHC/PH/CS/30/2020, by Hon.  Justice I. O. Oshomah sitting at the Port Harcourt Division of the Federal High Court, on December 11, 2020, which expressly held that, the National Assembly had no power to enact the VAT Act.

The statement further noted that in A.G. Rivers v. F.I.R.S. case, it was reported that the court has nullified the VAT Act and empowered the States to impose, demand and collect VAT within their states.

Following his arguments, Awogbade therefore noted that while the Institute was in possession of the first and second cases mentioned, it is making efforts to get a certified true copy of the third and current case.

“From the foregoing decisions, it is evident that this is not the first time that the VAT Act has been declared unconstitutional.

“As an Institute, we were waiting for the appellate courts to take a definite position on the matter before making our comments.

“In view of the length of time that it takes for an appeal to be determined in our country, we think it will be in the public interest not to wait any longer, hence this press release.

“As soon as we receive the certified true copy of the judgment, our legal advisers will study it and advise us accordingly.

“When that is done in the next few weeks, the Institute will take an informed position and the public will be duly communicated.

“We are mindful of our statutory mandate as a tax regulatory professional Institute and we will not shirk our responsibility to the public in all matters relating to taxation in Nigeria,” he said.

Vanguard News Nigeria

Disclaimer

Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of vanguard newspapers or any employee thereof.