By Henry Umoru
DEPUTY President of the Senate, Senator Ovie Omo Agege, All Progressives Congress, APC, Delta Central on Wednesday gave an insight into why the National Assembly cannot offer a brand new constitution, saying the National Assembly lacks the power to do so.
With the statement, Senator Omo- Agege is saying that that agitating for a brand new Constitution in Nigeria should jettison that dream.
According to him, the National Assembly has no powers to replace the current Constitution, but can only amend the same.
Speaking in Abuja when he hosted members of Alliance of Nigerian Patriots led by Ambassador Umunna Orjiako, Omo-Agege who chairs the Senate Adhoc Committee on Constitution Review, however, cited advanced democracies like the United States of America where Nigeria’s presidential system of government is fashioned after as well as Sections 8 and 9 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), the lawmaker said what is obtainable is the piecemeal alteration of the Constitution.
He tasked the group to reach out to other stakeholders across the country.
Omo- Agege who urged those calling for a brand new Constitution to channel their energy towards participating actively in the ongoing amendment of the Constitution by the Ninth Assembly, said: “One of the issues you raised is the replacement of the 1999 Constitution. I am not so sure that we as a Parliament have the power to replace the Constitution. We can only make amendments. And it is explicit in Sections 8 and 9 of the Constitution on how we can do that and the requisite number of votes required.
“I say that because there are some top attorneys in this country, who for some reason, keep saying that we don’t even need any of this, that we should just bring a new Constitution. We can’t do that. What we are mandated to do by law is to look at those provisions and bring them up-to-date with global best practices, especially to the extent that it tallies with the views of the majority of Nigerians. So we are not in a position to replace this Constitution but we can only amend it.
“But, as I said, most of the issues you have raised here, like zones replacing states, that’s another euphemism for going back to the regions. We will look into that if that is what the majority of our people want.
“You talked about the devolution of powers. The preponderance of views we have received so far is that those 68 items are very wide and need to shed some weight and move them to the Concurrent Legislative List”.
The Deputy President of the Senate who expressed his opinion on the call by some persons for the scrapping of the upper legislative chamber said that the country cannot practice unicameral legislature considering its large population, adding, “One of the issues raised by #EndSARS Protesters was that they should abolish the Senate and merge us with the House of Representatives. We are not in a position to do that. Mr. President is not even in a position to do that as well. Because they believe that he can just by fiat say ‘Senate bye-bye. it will now be a National Assembly made up of only the House of Representatives’.
“But, as I said at a different forum, the President does not have such powers and I am not so sure that even we can legislate out the National Assembly.
“There are people who believe that yes, we had the 2014 confab report that has been ‘transmitted’ to the National Assembly and there is the El-Rufai Report on Restructuring, 2018, that has been transmitted to the National Assembly and that we should just take them to Mr. President for his assent and we have the Constitution amended.
“But that is not how things are done here. We are a country governed by laws and the grund norm is the Constitution. And the Constitution itself has spelt out what we can do and how we can do it”.
Earlier in his remarks, Ambassador Orjiakor called for the reconfiguration of the present 36 states structure into six zones as federating units, a drastic cut in the Exclusive Legislative List and expansion of the Concurrent Legislative List, reform of the National Assembly to a hybrid Presidential and Westminster systems, the abolition of security votes to be replaced by regular security budget allocations and electoral reforms to ensure a truly independent INEC.
He also called for limited immunity for entitled public officers in the Executive branch of government, provision for independent candidacy in all elections, creating a consensual balance between meritocracy and federal character among others.