By Onozure Dania
A lawyer to some #EndSARS protesters in Lagos, Adesina Ogunlana, has requested that Minister of Works and Housing, Mr Babatunde Fashola, SAN be summoned by the Lagos State EndSARS panel to explain the circumstances in which he found a camera at the Lekki Tollgate.
Ogunlana informed the chairman of the panel, Justice Doris Okuwobi (rtd), that Fashola must be summoned to explain the circumstances in which he found a camera at the tollgate five days after the shooting incident.
Ogunlana, said the visit to the tollgate on October 25 when Fashola found a camera “suggests an intrusion” into the evidence of the October 20 shootings.
Ogunlana said this, Friday while cross-examining the Managing Director of the Lekki Concession Company, operator of the Lekki tollgate, Mr Abayomi Omomuwasan.
He asked Omomuwa if he was aware that “on October 25, the Governor of Lagos State brought some persons to visit the tollgate?” to which, Omomuwa said he only read it in the news.
Omomuwasan replied Ogunlana that he was not present during the visit because he does not report to the Lagos State Government.
Then Ogunlana asked him, “Where is that camera that the minister removed?” And in response, Omomuwa said, “I don’t know.”
However, counsel for LCC, Rotimi Seriki, objected to Ogunlana asking the MD that question. Replying Seriki, the #EndSARS protesters’ lawyer said the issue was crucial to his case and asked if the panel had issued a summons on Fashola.
But the panel chairman, Justice Okuwobi, told Ogunlana that he would have to follow the proper procedure if he wanted Fashola’s appearance before the panel.
Then, he hinted that he would be requesting that Fashola be summoned, Ogunlana said, “I wouldn’t know if it is too early for me to apply for Minister Fashola to appear before the panel to assist investigation?”
I don’t know how much LCC lost to Lekki tollgate occupation – MD
When asked by Ogunlana if the LCC lost revenue to the tollgate occupation by #EndSARS protesters, Omomuwasan said, “I believe that is the business of the company, not something to discuss in public.”
But when further probed , Omomuwasan said, “It is obvious, when toll is not collected, revenue is lost?”
But when Ogunlana asked, “How much did the company lose?” Omomuwa replied, “I don’t know.”
Asked if he reported the occupation of the tollgate by the #EndSARS protesters to the Lagos State Government, Omomuwa said he does not report to the Lagos State Government, he only reports to the LCC Board of Directors.
Asked what the LCC Board of Directors did on getting the report, Omomuwa said their decision was “wait and see”.
The MD told the panel that the tollgate was owned by private investors until 2014 when the Lagos State Government acquired it 100 per cent.
He listed the current directors of the company as the Lagos State Commissioner for Finance; Commissioner for Transport; the state’s Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice; Commissioner for Budget and Economic Planning; Special Adviser Works and Infrastructure, two independent directors – Obafemi George and Olusola Oworu – and himself.
I don’t know number of cameras at Lekki tollgate – MD
When asked by Ogunlana how many cameras were at the Lekki tollgate, Omomuwa said, “I don’t know.”
The MD said the LCC IT department, headed by Femi Oyinloye, was in charge of the cameras.
He added that a 40-man unit, led by Michael Aina, is responsible for manning the cameras.
Asked to name the specific officer manning the tollgate surveillance camera on October 20, Omomuwa said, “I do not have the name. If it is required, I can supply it. It was a human being, it is verifiable, I can bring it.”
The MD disagreed with Ogunlana that the surveillance camera was manually-controlled by the person manning it.
Ogunlana, however, suggested that there were substantial fluctuations in the zooming and panning intervals of the CCTV footage submitted to the panel by the LCC.
He applied to review the footage from 12am and 1pm to prove his argument.
The LCC counsel and the counsel for the Lagos State Government, Abiodun Owonikoko (SAN), objected but the panel overruled them.
The footage review could, however, not be done, as the panel had an issue with its projector.
The panel adjourned till December 11 for further proceedings.