ICPC urges youths to take ownership of anti-corruption fight  

Soni Daniel – Abuja

The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has secured a final forfeiture order on 25 properties in Abuja belonging to Shehu Yar’Adua Foundation and 24 other registered entities.

A Federal Capital Territory High Court 3, Maitama, presided over by Hon Justice Baba H. Yusuf, granted the ICPC the final forfeiture order on the properties.

The order obtained by the Commission against the properties is due to their owners’ failure to pay their taxes as at when due, for which the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) had to prepare a schedule of tax obligations against them.

ICPC Spokesperson, Mrs. Rasheedat Okoduwa, in a statement said the companies were among 29 entities that had earlier been approached with a net N8.6 billion tax liability, but they denied ownership of the properties.

For this reason, a complaint was submitted to the office of the Vice President, which in turn forwarded the complaint to the Commission for further action.

She said: “Consequently, ICPC filed an ex-parte application in the FCT High Court under Section 17 of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Related Offences Act, 2006, seeking an Interim Forfeiture Order against the properties of the tax defaulters, which was granted.

“In compliance with the order of the court, the Commission published notices in national newspapers calling for persons having interest in all or any of the forfeited properties to appear and ‘show cause’ why the said properties should not be finally forfeited to the federal government.

“That being so, three companies — Frankdiowo Nigeria Limited, Kati Nigeria Limited and R.Timmermann & Co Nigeria Limited – appeared in court to explain why their properties should not be finally forfeited by urging the court to discharge them.

“However, amongst them, only Frankdiowo Nigeria Limited showed ‘good cause’ and was discharged, while the other two will return to court for the hearing of their affidavits.”





Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of vanguard newspapers or any employee thereof.