As Moghalu challenges Gowon to open up on the civil war

From left: Prof Kingsley Moghalu, Senator Ike Ekweremadu and Mrs Bianca Ojukwu

By Vincent Ujumadu and Dennis Agbo

FORMER Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu, said yesterday that Igbos were not happy with their position in Nigeria, noting that there were many genuine reasons for them not to be satisfied with the system.

Speaking during the 2nd Dim Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu Memorial Lecture at the Igbariam campus of Chukwiuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Ekweremadu, who chaired the ceremony, said it was the imbalance that had resulted in agitations, adding however that he belonged to the school of thought that believed that Igbo could actualize their potentials in a structured Nigeria.

Citing the case in the senate, the former deputy senate president said while the South East has only 15 senators, others have 18, with one zone even having 21 senators.

ALSO READ: IPOB assault: Ekweremadu a scapegoat of impending revolution – Ikubese

According to him, the distribution of national wealth and revenue sharing formula did not help the Igbo to harness their potentials, adding that many issues needed to be redressed.

He said: “Ndigbo have many grouses which have made them not to be satisfied in the system, among which are the distribution of national wealth and infrastructure. This state of affairs does not make South Eat to move forward. There are those, especially the younger generation that believes that the best way forward was separation from the Nigerian state and the actualization of the Sovereign State of Biafra.

“This has resulted in agitations getting to a crescendo in recent years. But on the other hand, the school of thought to which I belong, believe that Igbo can actualize their potentials in a structured Nigeria.

“The Igbo, at various fora, have expressed their belief in a united Nigeria, but there is a need for true federalism, separation of powers, structural balance, rotational presidency, issue of local government creation, six-year one tenure for the president, among others.”

The guest lecturer and former presidential candidate of the Young Progressives Party, YPP, Prof. Kingsley Moghalu, challenged Nigeria’s former head of state, General Yakubu Gowon, to speak up about the genocide and all the other atrocities committed against the people of former Eastern Nigeria during the war because he still had the opportunity to do so.

Moghalu said it was ethically wrong for Nigeria to be participating in the commemoration of the Rwanda genocide, whereas worse atrocities that were committed in their own domain remained buried.

Delivering the keynote speech on the theme ‘Ndigbo in the Contemporary Nigeria Politics: problems, prospects and way forward’, Moghalu said that Gowon, as superintendent of the war, had long overstayed without making comments about his regrets or handicaps of the war.

He described Ojukwu as a product of his times, just like all the major actors in the Nigerian civil war, adding that he must therefore be judged in history strictly in that context.

He observed that without the large-scale massacres of Igbo in the Northern region of Nigeria after the July 1966 counter-coup, there would have been no Biafra.

He added that without the controversial failure of the Aburi Accord in early 1967, there also likely would have been no Biafra, noting that the two factual points were important because Nigeria had continued to wrongly hold Ndigbo as a people collectively guilty of the secession attempt, as if the Igbos woke up one bright morning and decided to leave Nigeria.

He said: “Clearly, those who blame Ojukwu for the effort by Igbos, under his leadership, to break away from Nigeria at that particular time and in the prevailing circumstances, are those who thrive in self-serving historical narratives. The reality of the time was that owing to an unfortunate set of circumstances, the security of the lives and property of Igbos in Nigeria could no longer be guaranteed. Ojukwu simply answered the call of duty.

“He rose to the occasion as a result of the weight and burden of historical responsibility upon his soldiers. The real and relevant question, looking back now, is: could the war have ended earlier in a negotiated settlement rather than the military collapse of Biafra and the short-lived republic’s ultimate surrender?

ALSO READ: BIAFRA AND ECHOES OF 1966: Ironsi exposed my dad to coup plotters — Son of Ojukwu’s deputy

“At any event, we must recognize that President Shehu Shagari’s noble decision to officially pardon Ojukwu — even if there were clear domestic political calculations embedded in it — and the former Biafran leader’s return to Nigeria in 1982, 12 years after the civil war ended, was one of the most remarkable attempts at nation-building in Nigeria.

“The narrative that the January 1966 coup was an “lgbo” coup has largely framed the Igbo in contemporary Nigerian politics, in particular, the relations between the Igbo in the Southeast and Northern Nigeria. I believe the January 1966 coup was, looking back, a big mistake, but not because it was an “lgbo” coup, because, from the historical accounts, it was not conceived as such.

“It was a strictly military affair, within the armed forces, and its planners and participants included several non-Igbo military personnel. There was no known, concerted group ethnic Igbo effort in its planning even inside the military, let alone outside the armed forces.

“Indeed, indications from some historians are that the main purpose of the coup was to release Chief Obafemi Awolowo from prison, where he was serving his sentence after conviction on treasonable felony, and install him as Prime Minister. A whole ethnic group cannot bear the responsibility for the actions of a few individual members of it, just as, for example, all Fulani in Nigeria today cannot bear responsibility for the criminal and terrorist acts of herdsmen who may happen to be Fulani.”

In any case, the Nzeogwu coup was frustrated and defeated by military officers of Igbo origin such as Gen. Thomas Aguiyi-lronsi and Col Emeka Ojukwu, although the genie was already out the bottle. The lopsidedness of the execution of the Nzeogwu-led coup, in terms of high-level casualties, cannot also be glossed over.

Understandably painful as it was, however, we have to tell ourselves the truth that the reactions to it, which continue to this day, have been extremely disproportionate. The January 1966 coup was a mistake (just as the July 29 coup was a second historical error, and two wrongs don’t make a right) because it was deeply naïve and was unnecessary. The civilian politicians of the time would ultimately have resolved the political crisis in the country if there had been no military intervention.

“If the frustration was about the corruption of the politicians of the time, well, Nzeogwu would turn in his grave if were alive today, and would doubtless have concluded that he made a big mistake, for the corruption then was a kindergarten class compared to what obtains in Nigeria today!

“But we need to heal, forgive collectively and move on as a country. Difficult as it might be, the Igbo should not remain permanently bitter about the loss of the lives of our loved ones. If we remain permanently bitter, we can’t heal. And if we can’t heal, we can’t compete effectively in the political terrain in Nigeria.

“But, realistically, the burden is far less on the Igbo who were the main victims of the tragedies of war but nevertheless have largely integrated back into Nigeria since the war, except, I would argue, in the political terrain, then it is on non-Igbo Nigerians who continue to resent the Igbo based on distorted historical narratives.

“I believe that the class of today’s military generals who fought to keep Nigeria one, and who later emerged as military-political leaders, bears an even heavier burden of history to close this horrible chapter by putting it in its proper and more accurate perspective.

“Among this class, Gen. Gowon as Commander in Chief and Head of State during the civil war is uniquely placed to speak directly about the war, acknowledge the pain of the loss of millions of lives, and express regret for the loss of so many lives. It is a tragic failure of nation-building that Nigeria’s Federal Government sends official delegations to the annual commemoration of the Rwandan genocide, but refuses to confront and address our own history of conflict and the millions who died in its wake. And so, bitter memories fester. We have difficulty in moving on because no one wants to address the pain directly.”

In her speech, the wife of the late Igbo leader, Mrs Bianca Ojukwu described the late Ikemba Nnewi as a man who jettisoned his silver spoon to defend the poor.

She, however, regretted that Ojukwu’s legacies, including the All Progressives Grand Alliance, APGA, were at the brink of extinction and charged Governor Willie Obiano of Anambra State to ensure they were sustained.

“Ezeigbo’s political machinery is fast eroding under the watch of Governor Obiano,” Bianca Ojukwu said.

Vanguard

Disclaimer

Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of vanguard newspapers or any employee thereof.