Breaking News

Bayelsa poll: Court begins hearing on Alaibe’s suit October 18

Kindly Share This Story:


Emem Idio – Yenagoa

Hearing on the substantive suit filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship aspirant in Bayelsa State, Chief Ndutimi Alaibe, challenging the conduct of the September 3 governorship primaries in the state will begin on October 18 at the Federal High Court, Yenagoa.


At the preliminary hearing on Monday, one of the defendants counsel, Chuks Oguru, argued that the Exparte Order earlier granted by the court which abridged the time given to the defendants to respond to the suit was contrary to Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as amended, and prayed the court to set aside the order to allow for fair hearing and to give them sufficient time to respond.

The counsel to Alaibe, Somina John-Bull, had on October 2, approached the court and obtained Exparte Orders for substituted service on the defendants and for the abridgement of time for the defendants to respond.

In his ruling, Justice Jane Inyang, granted the oral application of the defendants’ counsels and set aside the exparte order which abridged the time for the defendants to respond to the matter and adjourned the matter to October 18 for hearing on the substantive suit.

Reacting to the court’s ruling, Oguru said: ” Sometime last week, behind our back when the defendants haven’t been served, the plaintiff counsel came to the court and obtained an order that we be served by means of substituted service and also our time for responding to the case of the plaintiff which ordinarily should be 30 days or 42 days depending on the method they came with was abridged to five days including Saturday and Sunday and we were put under immense pressure to respond to the case contrary to Section 36 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 as amended.

“So, today all counsels in the matter applied to the court orally that that order be vacated so that the defendants will have sufficient time to respond to the case that has been brought against them and that is the position of the Constitution and that is the position of law.

“And the court displayed judicial activism and agreed with the submission of the defendants and set aside that Order.”



Kindly Share This Story:
All rights reserved. This material and any other digital content on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from VANGUARD NEWS.


Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of vanguard newspapers or any employee thereof.
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!