Breaking News
Translate

N2.4bn suit against Innoson: Court awaits Supreme Court’s decision

Federal High Court in Lagos, yesterday, adjourned until June 27 for the Supreme Court’s decision in the trial of Innosson Nigeria Ltd for a N2.4 billion suit over alleged falsification of shipping documents.

The Federal Government had through the office of the Attorney-General of the Federation, AGF, filed a four-count charge bordering on forgery against Innosson and four others before Justice Ayokunle Faji.

Listed as accused are: Innosson Nig. Ltd, Innocent Chukwuma, Charles Chukwu, Maximian Chukwura, Mitsui Osk Lines ‘C’ and Anajekwu Sunny.

The accused were alleged to have conspired to commit the offences on October 10, 2013 at Apapa Wharf, Lagos.

When the case was called on Tuesday, only one of the accused, Maximum Chukwura, was present in court.

  1. I. Ajakaiye announced appearance for the prosecution, George Uwechue (SAN) for the first and second accused, J. N. Mbadugha, appeared for the third and sixth accused, while Olusola Abimloye is for the fourth and fifth accused.

Addressing the court, Mr Mbadugha informed Justice Faji that the position at the Supreme Court remained the same as the pending appeal had not been heard.

He said he had also applied that the case should be given accelerated hearing.

In his reaction, Justice Faji asked if the prosecution as well as other defence counsel had been served with the application and Mr Mbadugha replied in the negative.

The court then held that it was wrong for defence counsel not to have served other parties with his application, adding that counsel cannot address the court “ex parte” (without notice to other parties).

On his part, the prosecutor, Mr Ajakaiye, informed the court that the facts of the case were not as stated by defence counsel.

According to the prosecutor, the appeal was entered at the Supreme Court on February 28 and by the court’s rules, the appellant ought to have filed his written brief within 10 weeks.

a stay of proceedings before his court.

In a short ruling, the court held that the manner with which Mr Mbadugha was handling the appeal was not in conformity with the provisions of Section 306 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act which supports speedy trial.

He held that criminal matters takes priority, adding that counsel must do all he could to avoid the notion that the court’s process was being abused.

Again, in view of the pending appeal, the court again adjourned the case until June 27 for a report of proceedings at the Supreme Court.

The prosecution alleged that the accused falsified shipping documents which they deposited with Guaranty Trust Bank as collateral for N2.4 billion, a facility allegedly granted Innosson Nigeria Ltd.

The shipping documents were also alleged to have been falsely presented as genuine and with intent to defraud in order to clear goods worth N2.4 billion.

The offences contravened the provisions of Sections 1(2) (c), and 3(6) of the Miscellaneous Offence Act, Laws of the Federation 2004.

 

 

All rights reserved. This material and any other digital content on this platform may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, written or distributed in full or in part, without written permission from VANGUARD NEWS.

Disclaimer

Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of vanguard newspapers or any employee thereof.