Breaking News

Syria: Obama gains domestic support for strike, as Putin softens

DAMASCUS, – Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday struck a more conciliatory tone ahead of this week’s G20 summit, saying Moscow would take “decisive” action if the West proved who used chemical weapons in Syria.

Putin’s comments came as US lawmakers begin rallying behind President Barack Obama’s plan to launch military strikes against Syria over a suspected poison gas attack outside Damascus that killed hundreds.

And as Obama seeks to cobble together an international coalition to back his plans for military intervention, France was Wednesday to hold an emergency parliamentary debate on the Syrian crisis.

Putin, in an interview apparently aimed at presenting a more pragmatic face to the world ahead of the G20 summit in Saint Petersburg, said he did not exclude Russia agreeing to US-led military strikes if it was proven Syria’s regime had carried out the August 21 attack.


But, he told state-run Channel One television, the West still needed to put forward watertight proof of the circumstances of the attack, which some Russian officials have blamed on rebels.

If there was clear proof of what weapons were used and who used them, Russia “will be ready to act in the most decisive and serious way,” Putin said.

Asked whether Russia would agree with US-led military strikes if it was proven that the Syrian regime had carried out the attack, Putin replied: “I do not exclude that.”

But he said it would be unacceptable for the West to go ahead with military action against the regime of Bashar al-Assad without the assent of the UN Security Council, where Russia has veto-wielding permanent membership.

Since the start of the Syrian conflict, the United States has frequently lamented Moscow’s support for President Bashar al-Assad and its decision to block any UN Security Council action to censure him or to use military action against his regime.

President Barack Obama: Their voices have been heard and Egypt will never be the same
President Barack Obama: Their voices have been heard and Egypt will never be the same

With relations between the Kremlin and the White House considered as brittle as they have been since the end of the Cold War, there are no plans for Obama and Putin to meet on the sidelines of the G20 summit.

But the Russian leader’s latest comments may at least help the leaders maintain a modicum of cordiality when they are forced to interact at leaders’ meetings and public photo ops.

Obama’s aides have said the US leader will use the summit to try to lobby international support for his strategy for a “proportional” military response.

Since British lawmakers voted down a bid to take any military action against Assad’s regime, Washington has found a strong partner in France but is seeking other allies.

Paris backs punitive military strikes against the regime and has urged its European Union partners to unite in response to the Syria crisis.

French President Francois Hollande can order military action without parliamentary approval but a poll Tuesday showed nearly three quarters of French people want parliament to vote on the issue.

Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault however has ruled out a vote as he insisted there was no doubt that Damascus was behind the deadly chemical attack.

Launching his international foray, Obama headed on Wednesday for Sweden for a two-day visit likely to revolve around Syria, before travelling on to Russia.

His trip comes after he made important political headway at home when top Republican leaders firmly backed his plan to punish Assad for the suspected chemical weapons attack.

After a passionate plea by US Secretary of State John Kerry not to succumb to “armchair isolationism”, lawmakers on Monday drafted a bipartisan measure imposing a 90-day deadline for any US military intervention.

It would also ban the deployment of any US troops on the ground in the war-torn nation, where fighting now in its third year has claimed more than 110,000 lives.(AFP)


Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of vanguard newspapers or any employee thereof.