Breaking News
Translate

Abia: My order sacking Ikpeazu stays – Justice Abang

By Ikechukwu Nnochiri, Anayo Okoli, Victor Otigbu & Ugochukwu Alaribe
ABUJA — The Federal High Court in Abuja, yesterday, dismissed as lacking in merit an application seeking to set aside the enrolled order of the judgment that sacked Governor Okezie Ikpeazu of Abia State from office.

This came on a day presiding judge of the Federal High Court, Owerri, Justice A. I. Alagoa,  fixed July 8 to deliver judgment on the tax forgery suit filed against Ikpeazu by a chieftain of Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, in Abia State, Mr. Friday Nwosu.

The court, in a ruling by Justice Okon Abang, maintained that all the orders contained in the judgment it delivered against Ikpeazu on June 27 subsist until they were set aside by the appellate court.

Justice Okon Abang and Governor Okezie Ikpeazu of Abia State
Justice Okon Abang and Governor Okezie Ikpeazu of Abia State

Justice Abang gave the ruling on a day the embattled governor, through his team of four Senior Advocates of Nigeria, led by Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN, applied for an order restraining the beneficiary of the verdict, Mr. Uche Ogah, and the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, from executing the judgment.

The judge had, in his judgment, ordered Ikpeazu to vacate his office, even as he directed INEC to immediately issue a fresh certificate of return to Ogah, who came second in the governorship primary election of the PDP.

Although INEC had since issued certificate of return to Ogah, another court in Abia State had restrained the Chief Judge from swearing him in.

Ikpeazu wants order set aside

Meantime, Ikpeazu, through his lawyers, yesterday, re-approached the high court, praying it to set aside its order dated June 27 that led to the issuance of certificate of return to Ogah.

Olanipekun urged the court to take judicial notice that INEC issued certificate of return to Ogah on June 30, despite the fact that it was served with Ikpeazu’s notice of appeal and application for stay of execution at exactly 12:50 p.m on June 28.

He contended that INEC acted wrongly by going ahead to issue the certificate to Ogah, two days after it was served with the appeal processes.

Olanipekun told the court that his client had filed “a comprehensive and elaborate notice of appeal,” and was “desirous of speedy and expeditious determination of the matter.”

Ogah accuses Ikpeazu of resorting to  self-help

However, Ogah, who was represented by five SANs, led by Dr. Alex Iziyon, urged the court to refuse Ikpeazu’s prayer for stay of execution of the judgment.

Ogah told the court that Ikpeazu obtained a restraining order from another high court at Osisioma in Abia State that prevented him from being sworn in.

He stressed that Ikpeazu got the restraining order from the high court in Abia when his motion for stay of execution was already pending before the court in Abuja.

“Where a party has taken to self-help, your lordship should refuse to indulge them further,” he argued.

Responding, Olanipekun said it was Ogah and INEC that “deliberately and calculatively resorted to self-help in order to frustrate both the motion for stay of execution and the pending appeal.”

He relied on Order 4 Rule 1(2) of the Judgment Enforcement Rules to argue that there should have been a timeline for enforcement of the June 27 verdict that removed his client.

Olanipekun insisted that INEC “illegally tampered with the res of the case” by issuing certificate of return to Ogah, despite the pending appeal against the judgment.

He also prayed the court to adjourn hearing on the motion for stay of execution until Thursday to enable him respond to a further affidavit  filed by Ogah.

On its part, INEC lawyer, Mr. Alhassan Umar, told the court that the commission had already issued certificate of return to Ogah as it was ordered to do, before it was served with Ikpeazu’s motion for stay.

Umar said though the certificate was signed on June 28, it was, however, handed to Ogah two days later.

According to INEC lawyer, “My lord ordered the 3rd defendant to issue certificate of return forthwith and upon service of the order, my lord, on June 28, the 3rd defendant issued a certificate of return accordingly.

“The certificate of return was issued before we were served with the motion on June 28. We had issued the certificate upon being served with the court order. But the actual presentation of the certificate was on June 30. But we had complied with the order of my lord.

“We had no difficulty to issue the certificate because election matters are sui-generis.  Where the law intends that an appeal should operate as a stay, it is expressly provided so. In our view, this matter is not regulated by Section 143 of the Electoral Act.”

My order sacking Ikpeazu stays —Judge

In his ruling, Justice Abang refused to set aside the order containing the judgment against Ikpeazu, even as he adjourned hearing on the motion for stay of execution till Thursday.

The judge said he would on that day also decide on an application by Ogah seeking to set aside the restraining order of the High Court in Abia State, as well as an application asking him to set aside the certificate of return INEC issued to Ogah.

Justice Abang held that the enrolment order against Ikpeazu was properly signed and issued.

The judge said though section 294 of the constitution allowed the court to get the judgment ready within seven days, he said the registry ensured it was available in four days, owing to pressure from Ikpeazu.

He said: “I had jurisdiction to sign the enrolment order as at the time I did so.  The court cannot order a sitting governor to vacate his office just for fun. We are here to settle dispute and I am not afraid to take decision.

“Therefore, those going to the media to misinterpret the decision of the court when they have not even taken out time to study the 131-page judgment should take caution.”

Judgment on tax forgery suit for July 8

Meanwhile, presiding judge of the Federal High Court, Owerri, Justice A. I. Alagoa, has fixed July 8, to deliver judgment on the tax forgery suit filed against Ikpeazu by Nwosu.

Nwosu, who ran for the December 8, 2014, PDP governorship primaries in the state, had accused the governor of submitting a forged tax clearance certificate, praying the court to disqualify him.

Joined in the suit were the PDP, INEC, Ikpeazu and Ogah as 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants, respectively.

The parties adopted their written addresses. Counsel to Nwosu, F. Unyimadu, prayed the court to grant the prayers of his client by disqualifying Ikpeazu for submitting forged tax certificate and declare him governor. Unyimadu added that the governor was not qualified to run for the primary election.

He further argued that Ogah, who refused to sign the result and petitioned the PDP to conduct another primary election, had forfeited his right to benefit from the exercise.

In their separate arguments, counsel to PDP, INEC, Ikpeazu and Ogah, Paul Ananaba (SAN), Jude Nnodum (SAN), Theo Nkire and O.J. Nnadi (SAN), respectively, said Nwosu’s suit lacked merit and urged the court to dismiss it.

Earlier, the counsel had opposed an attempt by Ogah’s counsel to leverage on the judgment of the Federal High Court, Abuja, which declared him governor. This was upheld by the judge, who ruled that he was not bound by the verdict of a court of the same hierarchy.

In a related development, Nwosu has filed a notice of appeal on the judgment of the Federal High Court, Abuja, which declared Ogah as governor, praying the court to set it aside and declare him governor.

In a notice of appeal filed against Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/71/2016, between Sir Friday Nwanozie Nwosu (Appellant) and Sampson Uchechukwu Ogah, Peoples Democratic Party, Dr. Okezie Victor Ikpeazu, and the Independent National Electoral Commission, as Respondents, Nwosu listed nine grounds of appeal and particulars of error on the judgment delivered by Justice Okon Abang on October 27.

While praying the Court of Appeal to set aside the judgment, Nwosu also sought five reliefs: “an order setting aside the declaration of first respondent, Uche Ogah, as the elected governor of Abia State as declared by the trial court.

Others include: “an order that the first Respondent, Uche Ogah, is stopped from claiming any right or benefit from the second respondent’s (PDP) Gubernatorial Primary Election of 8/12/2014, in Abia State, having waived his right to do so; an order striking out the first respondent’s (Uche Ogah) suit on the ground that it constitutes an abuse of court process; an order that the suit of first respondent i.e. (Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/71/2016) is incompetent and the trial court lacks the jurisdiction to hear and determine the suit.”

lNEC must  reverse itself  —PDP chieftain

Reacting to the development, Mr. Ben Onyechere, a PDP chieftain and former Special Assistant to Dr. Alex Ekwueme, said  the rush by INEC to implement the judgment of a Federal High Court that annulled the election of Governor Okezie Ikpeazu of Abia State on the reason that it did not receive the notice of appeal from the governor’s lawyers was a clear indication of a well scripted conspiracy and attempt to disenfranchise the entire Abia electorate.

According to him, the judgment is the worst embarrassment that has befallen the judiciary in recent times.

He said: “The ruling by Justice Abang is a dangerous trend occurring in an area reputed for high volatility, especially with the presence of a pro-Biafran group whom the governor is labouring to assuage. It is indeed curious and laughable to behold an INEC official with guilt written all over him  on TV saying that they never received notice of appeal from Ikpeazu’s lawyer, only to admit receipt of appeal after perpetrating their plan.

“The judge, who turned himself to prosecutor, investigator and adjudicator, refused to determine a simple fact of whether the governor was actually working for government which automatically means his taxes were deductible on monthly basis.

“However, the onus now rests on INEC officials, who have now admitted receipt of the appeal, to quickly reverse themselves without delay to avert the looming disaster in Abia.”

Ikpeazu submitted tax certificate in error —Abia PDP

Also reacting, Abia State chapter of the PDP,  yesterday, said the tax certificate submitted to INEC by Ikpeazu was done in error, saying tax certificate was not one of the requirements to run for the office of governor.

The party also alleged that Ogah had very powerful forces backing him in the fight to sack Ikpeazu as governor of Abia State but did not name the powerful forces.

A statement signed by Chief Johnson Onuigbo, Ikechukwu Omenihu, and Sir. Don Ubani, the party’s state chairman, Legal Adviser and Publicity Secretary, respectively, said tax certificate had never been a requirement to run for office of the governor, insisting that Ikpeazu’s aides put it in error.

It said: “Nigerians should be informed  that there is no requirement for payment of tax at all or as and when due in the constitution, Electoral Act or INEC nomination form. The tax documents were included in the documents accompanying his nomination form by Dr. Ikpeazu’s aides by mistake.

“The tax documents included by aides of Dr. Ikpeazu in the nomination form sent to INEC are genuine and there are absolutely no false entries in them and even if for purposes of argument, there were mistakes in the tax documents, Dr. Ikpeazu was not responsible for such mistakes and the  mandate given him by hundreds of thousands of Abia voters cannot be invalidated on the basis of a spurious and unfounded allegation.”

Citing some legal decisions, the party said: “We have taken the trouble to set out these few examples of the principles governing our democratic process just to demonstrate to Nigerians what is under attack by Uche Ogah and his cohorts: a sacrosanct mandate donated to Dr. Okezie Ikpeazu by citizens of Abia State.

“It is the constitution that sets out the criteria for eligibility to stand for election as governor. By Section 177 of the 1999 Constitution, there are only four requirements or conditions for eligibility to the office of Governor: citizenship of Nigeria, attainment of 35 years of age, membership/sponsorship of a political party and education up to School Certificate level or its equivalent.

“Section 182 of the Constitution sets out other events that could disqualify a candidate and non-payment of tax at all or as and when due is not one of them. There is no requirement for payment of tax under the Electoral Act.

“An examination of the nomination form for all elective offices in Nigeria, including for governorship shows clearly that payment of tax is not mentioned and tax receipts or tax clearance certificates are not one of the documents required to be included in the form.

“Dr. Ikpeazu’s tax documents were either mistakenly included in the bundle of documents accompanying his Nomination Form by his aides or simply added out of the abundance of caution.”

Enforce judgment now—EUF

But a  group, the Eastern Unity Forum (EUF) has demanded the immediate enforcement of the order of the  Federal High Court that removed Ikpeazu from the office as governor of Abia State, urging the Attorney General of the Federation, Inspector General of Police, the Director of the Department of State Services and other security agencies to enforce the court order without further delay and avoid brewing anarchy in the state.

It described the judgment obtained by Ikpeazu as judicial coup, occasioned by impunity which must not be allowed to stand.

The group at a press briefing in Abuja, yesterday, by its National President, Chief Emmanuel Okereke and National Secretary, Chief Willy Ezugwu, vowed to mobilize the people to enforce the court judgment if security agencies failed to do their job.

Describing the court verdict obtained by the embattled Abia State governor from the state High Court as a judicial coup, the group said: “For Mr. Okezie Ikpeazu to rush to another court of coordinate jurisdiction to arrest the unambiguous judgment delivered by Justice Okon Abang on Monday, June 27, 2016 which ordered that Ogah be sworn in immediately is nothing but a delay tactics and judicial coup that must not be allowed to stand.

“We, therefore, call on the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), the Inspector General of Police (IGP), the Director of Department of State Services (DSS) and all other security agencies and law enforcement agencies of the Federal Government to wake up and be alive to their constitutional duties and ensure that Dr. Uchechukwu Sampson Ogah is sworn in as Abia State governor without further delay.”

Declare Alex Otti gov —APGA

In another development, the All Progressives Grand Alliance, APGA, Abia State chapter, has faulted the judgment of the Federal High Court which ordered that Ogah be sworn in as the state governor.

A statement signed by APGA state chairman, Augustine Ehiemere,  decried the judgment as untenable as the Electoral Act 2010, as amended, forbade any person who did  not take part  in all stages of the election to be sworn in and insisted that its governorship candidate in the 2015 election, Dr. Alex Otti, remained the lawful candidate who ought to be declared governor.

“APGA considers Uche Ogah’s declaration as a huge error, unacceptable to the party, untenable in Nigeria’s 2010 Electoral Act as amended, which forbids any person that did not take part in all the stages of an election from being declared winner.

“Since there is no record anywhere to show that Dr. Uche Ogah won the primaries of his party, the PDP, let alone take part in all the stages of the last governorship election in Abia, his declaration as the governor by the court is strange and alien to the law.

“Hence, we humbly demand that the appellate court, while upholding Ikpeazu guilty verdict, corrects this huge error by issuing the right order which is to declare the candidate who scored the highest lawful votes, the APGA candidate,  Dr. Alex Otti,  governor, as he did not only meet all the constitutional requirements and vote spread across the state, but even won more local governments than the sacked Okezie Ikpeazu; this is an incontrovertible fact.”

 


Disclaimer

Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of vanguard newspapers or any employee thereof.