2015: Nigerians will reject ‘Angry Peoples Congress’at the polls-— Senator Adokwe

on   /   in Politics 1:15 am   /   Comments

APC-PDPIn this interview, Senator Suleiman Adokwe representing Nasarawa South speaks on the defection of some  members of the Peoples Democratic Party  (PDP) to the  opposition All Progressive Congress (APC). He also speaks  on the chances of the PDP not only at the presidential election  in 2015 but also in other  elections.
Excerpts:

There are issues in the polity and people  fear  they are  capable of causing problems in the country. Why do you think the system is so heated?
Usually, when we approach the election year, we have all this heating up of the polity. It is a recurrent decimal in the political activities of the country but this one is a bit unusual because of the  stress that is being put on the polity by the various movements  and the repositioning of the various political parties preparatory to the 2015 elections.

Some of the things that have become issues really ought not to be issues but the struggle for power has become more intensely, uncivilised  if you add  the  issue  like somebody should  run or not run for the  presidency,  or the leadership must go to another region as if we do not have a  Constitution in  place to guide everybody. There are rules and regulations on how to seek power in the country and for a foreclosure to be made that this man cannot run,  power must shift from this place or else heaven will fall,  we have never  witnessed this kind of undue pressure on the polity.

We are witnessing a new dimension to politicking, which is regrouping, personalising the polity in terms of who can rule and who is supposed to be excluded when the  Constitution and Electoral Act  provide  the rules for who can qualify and who cannot qualify. So you work in accordance with those rules, not some imaginary interests  and then you foreclose someone, or you foreclose a region, or you foreclose some  party and cling to the bargain that the  heavens  would fall.

Some of the languages that we hear these days are so  frightful, they are virtually an invitation to anarchy. This is what makes it a little bit different from what has been happening in the past, but we believe  those  are the usual preparations for elections and that we should allow ourselves to get to the elections proper.

Some people have argued that  the failure of your party, the  PDP , to  provide  good governance  is responsible for the problems in the country. Do you share this perspective?
The people saying so are the people who left the PDP for the APC. Some of them were governors for more than eight  years and they had opportunities to do those things  they are kicking against and so, I find it hypocritical for someone who has been in power  since the inception of this administration or since the inception of the new dispensation, the fourth republic, to turn a round to say nothing has been done.

How on earth will somebody like  former Vice President Atiku have moral justification to say PDP has not done anything when he was in power  for eight  years and he was  a founding  member of  the PDP.  Or  the former governors who ruled for eight  years, some of them are in the Senate, what moral justification  do  they have to condemn  the  PDP?

Even some of  the founding members of APC who  have been in government since the inception of this administration,  the governor of Kano State for example,  this is the second time he is governing, he was a minister of defence; so  since 1999 he has been in the government of PDP until  he defected.  If it is the ordinary Nigerian people who voted for all of us  who now feel  they are fed up with  the PDP come 2015,  it is their prerogative to vote out the party,  but not somebody who has been in the corridors of power  all along to turn around to say nothing has happened; it is only in Nigeria you can get that kind of talk .

Don’t you think that the defection of senators and  governors portends ill  for the PDP in 2015, it may affect  its  chances.?.
Political movement naturally will affect your chances one way or the other, nobody wants somebody who is with him to leave, even in ordinary marital divorce.. Of course PDP  is not pretending to say that this has not hurt, it hurts; that is why certain changes had to be made.

We now have a new Chairman of the party who is going all out to reinvent the party and to reposition the party to recover from the shocks of defections here and there. Today,  we are even having people from APC defecting back to  the PDP,  that is a sign of recovery. It is our hope that before the year runs out, we would have stabilised and positioned to face the elections  in 2015.

What is your reaction to the directive by the APC to its members in the National  Assembly that they should not work on the budget and other executive bills?
The language of  the APC is not  democratic; the  language  is an invitation to anarchy, to chaos. In the National Assembly, debates take place,  vested interests are protected in the course of  debates. Bills get thrown out, bills get supported and this happens  every day;  even PDP legislators can find out something in the budget that they wouldn’t want  to sail through, but you don’t set out right from day one to say that no matter how good or bad  that bill is, make sure it is thrown out.

The purpose of law making is to make a good law for the good governance of the country. If there are inherent distortions in the budget that do not reflect the interest of  the APC, it is for their legislators to see how those interests can be addressed in the budget, but, under all circumstances, there is the need for a budget to be in place so that development can take place.

The American democracy which is the example that we copy from, where sometimes they get to the point of a shut down,  the whole nation rises up to condemn Congress  and,  for the APC  to call  that its MPs  should  shut down the economy, it is not sensitive to the yearnings and aspirations of the ordinary people.

Now and fortunately, the system in Nigeria is not the same with America in the sense that our Constitution provides for  the President to run the country based on the previous budget for a period of six months and two third of the budget in subsequent months until the budget is passed; so the President may even have a better deal if you refuse to pass the bill, he will simply implement the budget of the previous year and then you will not even be in the position to deal with it again because there is no real law in place except that he has a constitutional right to spend as much as he spent in the previous financial year; so I don’t know the purpose  they seek out to achieve other than create political chaos in the country.

I think they have seen the futility of it, they have seen that the ordinary people don’t think they should go to that extreme. By saying  security  should be shut down, you are saying  people should resort to self- help. Indeed, one governor directed that people should resort to-self help. How can you be a sitting governor and direct that people should resort to self- help?

The purpose for which government is put in place first and foremost is to provide welfare and security.  If you are a sitting governor and you now directing people to go for  self- help, you are negating the principles of state and state power, the purpose that we have a government. If  government cannot do that anymore, then government has  no reason to exist.

The time table released by the Independent National Electoral Commission which places  the presidential election  before other elections has generated some controversy.  Do you think INEC is justified in its decision? The INEC acted in accordance with the Electoral  Act. What  does the Act say? In the last amendment, the national election of the President and the National Assembly came first; that was what happened in the last elections and the Act has not been amended.

    Print       Email