Breaking News
Translate

Uwais Report: CNPP faults Jonathan on facebook Account strategy

By Kingsley omonobi
The Conference of Nigeria Political Parties (CNPP) at the weekend disagreed with President Goodluck Jonathan over the idea of setting up a facebook account as his own contribution to the debate for electoral reforms saying Mr. President should rather submit the three bills contained in the Uwais Report as Executive Bills to the National Assembly for adoption.

In a statement at Abuja, the CNPP said that President Goodluck Jonathan is regrettably, from all indication either out of touch with the diversionary tactics, contempt and scant commitment of the National Assembly as per genuine electoral reform or is in an unholy alliance with the National Assembly to dump the Uwais Report.

They frowned with the National Assembly for placing inconsequential issues like educational qualification of candidates above core recommendations of the Uwais Report like insulation of the president from single handedly appointing INEC chairman and key officers.

The statement signed by Mr. Osita Okechukwu states, CNPP said “the rational commitment they expect from President Jonathan is to mobilize forthwith the over 800 out of 990 Members of State Houses of Assembly nationwide, over 260 out of 360 Members of the Federal House of Representatives and over 90 out of 109 Senators of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) which he leads, to alter the relevant sections of the 1999 Constitution and 2006 Electoral Act in accordance with the Uwais Report; instead of wittingly embarking on FaceBook voyage of discovery”.

“Finally the CNPP notes that time is of essence, especially when genuine electoral reform is the most precious legacy President Jonathan can earnestly bequeath to Nigerians and which cannot be achieved through Face Book Account; as the Uwais Report is an article of faith and guiding principle in any attempt to construct a truly Independent National Electoral Commission; Hence abolish the sad days of electoral malfeasance”.


Disclaimer

Comments expressed here do not reflect the opinions of vanguard newspapers or any employee thereof.