By Peter Osalor
In a 2007 statement, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) mentions the Nigerian Paradox: dreadful poverty in a country with bountiful natural and human resources. Although Nigeria is not an OECD member, the economic history and potential of this sub_Saharan nation holds out globally relevant lessons.
With a population of 148 million and the second largest economy in the continent after South Africa, the state of Nigeriaâ€™s economy is a bundle of extreme contradictions.
The US sources 10% of its crude imports from abundant oil fields in the Niger Delta, a region that is also home to one of the largest know natural gas reserves in the world. Despite these natural endowments, Nigeria is crippled with rampant poverty and depressing macroeconomic indicators and human development indices. Decades of political turmoil, civilian unrest and large scale government mismanagement are largely to blame for this state of Nigerian affairs.
Democracy has paved the way for economic reforms and the adoption of the vision 2020. A massive subsequent reprioritisation of economic policy initiatives has brought home tangible results: currency reserves grew fivefold between 2003 and 2006, while GDP growth averaged more than 7%. However, and because of long_standing systemic imbalances, per capita GDP dipped from $444 in 1997 to $430 in 2004, even as poverty levels actually increased.
The bulk of the problem has been Nigeriaâ€™s over dependence on oil and gas exports that fetched it an estimated $600 billion in the last five decades, but made little difference to the non_oil sector, which floundered in a climate of policy negligence and inadequate financial and technical support.
The thrust of Nigeriaâ€™s renewed economic objectives must be on entrepreneurship development, taking into account its mammoth human resource capability, and in a manner that makes inclusive yet rapidly accelerated economic growth possible. Weaning away dependence on non_renewable resources with the simultaneous promotion of micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) is crucial to achieving both the 2020 objective and Nigeriaâ€™s Millennium Development Goals.
MSMEs have been responsible for the rapid growth of a multitude of economies around the world, historically beginning with the UK and America to gradually Europe, Latin America and lately in considerable parts of South and East Asia. Currently, more than 90% of all enterprises in the world are estimated to be MSMEs, accounting for up to 80% of total employment prospects. In OECD countries, the MSME component is as high as 97% of total business activity, contributing between 40% and 60% of GDP in member countries. These statistics hide a wealth of ideas for Nigeria, in the context of its economic development targets.
First among them is the fact that wholesome MSME growth is fundamental to the expansion of rural economies as part of sustained macroeconomic development. MSMEs comprise a diverse mix of agriculture_based, production, services and trade sectors; classified on the basis of asset value and employee base on a given scale of maximum and minimum scores for both counts.
They often represent an extreme variety in terms of size and structure, right from rural artisan guilds, through small machine shops to emerging software and IT firms. They are by definition dynamic and comprise a wide range of growth_oriented skill sets, with special needs in terms of innovative solutions, technology and equipment and knowledge up_gradation. The central requirement in promoting them, however, is the development of a viable micro-finance industry with built_in ease of access for small and medium enterprises.
At the policy level, Nigeria has taken proactive steps to promote MSME initiatives, the most notable being a legislative amendment that requires commercial banks operating in the country to set aside 10% of pre_tax profits for investment in smaller businesses. Both the IMF and World Bank currently run separate outreach programmes to aid Nigerian micro_financing through tailored procedures for streamlining credit evaluation and monitoring micro-loans.
The effectiveness of these measures has been borne out to some extent by recent developments.
Last year, the Nigerian government announced the disbursement of $20 million in small_scale industry loans. This is a significant achievement considering it multiplied out of the $8.4 billion initial World Bank grant to the sector in 2006. Policy makers negotiated the habitually poor access to loan and equity capital in Nigeria with the introduction of new micro_financial institutions that afforded wider and deeper funding solutions.
Despite this initial euphoria, the overall Nigerian MSME productivity and growth potential remains acutely constrained. Business development services continue to be generally underdeveloped in terms of projected potential, and especially poor in rural areas outside the major urban focus centres. Besides inherent infrastructural deficits, MSME growth rates are being further affected by lack of entrepreneurial knowledge, especially the ability to identify rewarding business opportunities.
In view of Nigeriaâ€™s past and present ground realities, an appropriate environment for rapid growth in this key sector calls for certain basic enforcements, including:
â€œÂ Â Â Effective government regulation and oversight of micro-finance institutions (MFIs) and operations.
â€œÂ Â Â MFI reinforcement through constant evaluation of best practices and sustainability.
â€œÂ Â Â Capacity enhancement of loan disbursement schemes for wide_area applicability.
â€œÂ Â Â Greater coordination between the various agencies involved _ public, private and donor.
There is for sure no short cut or panacea to the enterprises endeavour. The World Bank outlines the broader perspectives of the MSME development programme in Nigeria with five priorities: enhancing the breadth and depth of finances available to MSMEs, creating markets for business development services, providing technical and capacity building support, resource allocation for access to global best practices, and lastly, funding for execution, review and monitoring of individual projects.
The existential value of MSMEs derives from the fact that they provide products and services that their larger counterparts do not or cannot do. Recognising and leveraging this potential is only half the job.
The real challenge for Nigeria does not end at achieving the fullest prospects of MSMEs, but on then integrating their success to create a more inclusive economy that is without the flaws that have nagged the widest majority of its populace for the better part of half a century.