Bayelsa community raises alarm over fresh gas flare

By Samuel Oyadongha
Yenagoa—The people of Gbarantoru community, a predominantly farming and fishing settlement in Yenagoa local government area of Bayelsa State, have raised an alarm over the ignition of a new gas flare furnace in their community by Shell Petroleum Development Company.

Though the Federal Government has been under intense pressure to put an end to gas flaring due to its adverse effects on human health and the environment, the people of Gbarantoru yesterday accused SPDC of igniting a new gas flare site, about one hundred and twenty metres from their community.

Lamenting the one week-old gas flare, a native of the community, Mr. Bubaraye Dakolo, said they were taken aback by the action of the company, especially at a time when efforts were on to put an end to gas flaring world-wide due to its negative effects on the environment.

While condemning the recent act by Shell, Mr. Dakolo observed that “by the emission and flaring of this noxious substance into our environment, Shell has decided to deny us of an environment safe enough for our development. Without any notice the community was woken up rudely one night by this deafening sound you can hear now.”

Dakolo and other community folks who led a delegation of Environmental Rights Action (ERA) to the flare site added: “We are not only very apprehensive, we are also aware of the noxiousness of gas flare. That is why we are very uncomfortable with the situation. As you can observe, the flare point is just about a hundred and twenty meters from our living homes.

“This thing (flare) was not here last week. And, it shouldn’t be here either, for we are not talking about any benefits here; you don’t need to die to get benefits. Shell should not gas us to death. If we go through the main entrance now you will notice men of the Joint Task Force there and, they will deny us access to the site.”

“We want Shell to relocate this gas flare from our environment. Luckily I was part of the Global Memorandum of Understanding (GMOU) between Shell and the cluster communities. And while discussing that document, there was no mention in any part that gas would be flared here in our community.

“What we know is that a gas gathering plant would be sited around here and that the product would be channeled to Bonny in Rivers State.

So, why should Shell now gas us through the back? Like you can observed we cannot hear each other now unless we raise our voices higher than normal due to the roaring, deafening sound from the gas flare furnace. It then means both speakers and listeners in the community would now be subjected to a new culture of shouting and straining of ears just to communicate with each other. And, you know what this means health wise, even psychologically speaking.

“Again, apart from the huge economic waste in flaring gas, the noxiousness of it is grave too health wise. If you also take a look at our roofs now you will notice that there is a heavy settlement of soot on them. From this too, you can see that we can no longer drink from our roofs.

“My mother is about 80 years old now and she is in the village. If this gas flare should continue, may be you will be invited soon to her funeral. So, what the people of this community are saying is that, Shell should not do this thing here; the company should relocate the gas flare, away from our environment.”

Also reacting to new gas flare site, ERA Field Officer in Bayelsa State, Mr. Alagoa Morris called on the company to stop the flaring, saying the development should be condemned by all, especially at a time when concerted effort is on to make gas flaring a history.

4 Responses for “Bayelsa community raises alarm over fresh gas flare”

  1. Appah says:

    Olamenka, I don’t agree with your comment, because SHELL as a company preaches HSE than any other company in the sector here in Nigeria and is so strict about it, so, why are they not practicing what they preach. Now what do you expect the community to do, close their mouths and forget about the whole thing because they were not proactive, or may be they would’ve gone there with armed youths to stop SHELL, (well, may be because that’s the easiest way to make them listen). I am a Niger Deltan and speaking from that perspective and coupled with previous happenings and with the fact that there was no mention in any part of the Global Memorandum of Understanding (GMOU) between SHELL and the cluster communities that gas would be flared in the community, this whole thing is intentional, it’s oppression and a calculated attempt to interrupt the peace process going on.

  2. mary says:

    come to Ireland to north mayo and see the oil and gas project shell staoil is organising the local people have delayed the project since 2000 and are still fighting with no govt support. The project totally disregards the local health and safety of up to 9,000 residents. Flaring is also mentioned as a back up when neccessary – basically they do as they wish with little regard to laws of the land and the health and safety of the communities in which they occupy. The local people came up with a safe altenative on the coast where no communities live but this was rejected by shell so the battle for the safety of its community continues. Nigeria you are not alone- shell has no favouritism over what environment it destroys.

  3. Olamenka says:

    I do not understand, why did the community have to wait till shell ignited the flare before they raised an alarm…? did they not know what shell was building…? Did they raise an alarm during construction of the facility and shell ignored them….? If we are going to tackle this menace of gas flaring by the IOCs then we need to be more proactive in handling it.

  4. Alexander says:

    Shell should be ban from operating in nigeria if it cannot do busines without destroying the environment and killing the inhabitant.

Comments are closed

-->
Home - Back to top^ - Log in - Content, Copyright 2009 - Vanguard Media Limited.