Niger Delta: The impending military assault

By Sabella Ogbobode Abidde
“Violence begets violence; repression begets retaliation”…Senator Robert Kennedy

Dear  World Citizens,
WHAT reasonable President bombs his own country simply because he is in search of a few criminals? What sane government spends billions of dollars on the acquisition of military hardware for the sole purpose of destroying his people and his country, when such an amount could have been used for the development of the same region?

“ Alea iacta est: The die is cast. The assault on the Niger Delta is about to begin.”

Beginning in 1999 when the President Olusegun Obasanjo’s regime came into being, there were ample opportunities to solve some of the most pressing problems that have confronted the country since 1914, when a parchment of differences were put together to form a single political entity. At the very least,

Obasanjo could have made genuine attempts at solving those that have confronted the country since 1960. But he didn’t. He was in power for eight years during which time he legalized corruption, mediocrity and inanity. He was succeeded by Umaru Musa Yar’Adua –  a president who relies primarily on the military and the hawks around him to do his biddings.

President Yar’Adua’s greatest challenges seem to be his deteriorating health, how to rein in his greedy associates, how to rule the country, and how to approach the Niger Delta tragedy. And a tragedy it is. Insofar as the Niger Delta is concerned, the President’s approach has been to listen to the dictates of the military and the Arewa Consultative Forum: annihilate trouble-makers and restless communities in the region. The goal of his government is not to arrest and prosecute, but to invade, destroy and kill.

This mild_mannered and self_effacing man has turned out to be more brutal that General Obasanjo. And so, Alea iacta est: The die is cast.

The assault and annihilation of the Niger Delta is about to begin.
Daniel Volman, the Director of the African Security Research Project in Washington, DC, is reporting that the Yar’adua government “is set to launch a full-scale offensive in the Niger Delta when a ceasefire declared by the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) ends on 15 Sep 2009. And this time, Nigerian military forces will be using special warships, helicopter gunships and troop transports, and unmanned drone intelligence planes and ships sold to Nigeria by Israeli, Malaysian, Singaporean, Dutch, and Russian companies.”

Mr. Volman went to say that “Israeli and Russian instructors have been providing specialized training to Nigerian Navy and Air Forces sailors and pilots in how to operate the ships and helicopters over the past few months, and some of these instructors may help operate them during the offensive.” As disquieting as this report may sound, Niger Deltans __ especially the Ijaw ethnic nationality __ have been expecting such a move for quite some time now.

Indeed, how to deal a knock_out blow to the Ijaw have been on the government’s agenda since the escalation of hostilities in 2001, and the formation of MEND in 2005. They have waited and waited and waited. The time seems to have come.

Historically, citizens of the Niger Delta have been a thorn on the flesh of pre and post_colonial Nigerian governments. Not a people to suffer injustice in silence, they have a history of political activism that dates back to the 18th century, at least. Rulers who opposed the shenanigan and the inhumane behavior of European powers were dethroned, killed, or sent abroad to die.

Indeed, European powers made sure that the region was thoroughly destabilized by engaging in and introducing ethnic politics, malevolent survival strategies, and divide_and_rule politics. In the intervening years, successive Nigerian governments, military and/or civilian, have continued such practices.

Depending on the context, there is the geographical Niger Delta, the political Niger Delta and the economic Niger Delta. In general, however, when people speak of the Niger Delta they are basically referring to the vast expanse of land and waterways that houses virtually all of the oil and gas that supports the domestic and global economy.

In this case, the Ijaw land. For more than 200 years, the Ijaw Nation has cemented its place in the international political economic system.

For instance, the Ijaw territory was the center of commerce – renown for its trade in ivory, palm oil, and other natural resources. It was also a center of the African Atlantic slave trade. And for a period in its history, it had an independent diplomatic relations with European powers.

Then and now, especially since the last forty_five yeas, how to subjugate and control the Ijaw has been a preoccupation, an obsession even, on the part of the Nigerian government.

Why would a people who have always fought for their inalienable rights suddenly acquiesce to the shenanigans, the duplicity, and the brutality of the Yar’Adua’s regime? Other than a handful of hungry elites and misled commoners, no one, in my view, is going to succumb to Yar’Adua’s threat and actual use of force.

President Yar’Adua, the Arewa Consultative Forum, and their band of fellow travelers may, in the end, find themselves in the deepest end of the river, without a life jacket. They should know, or should have known that this is a conflict that can never be solved by military force.

Indeed, no amount of military brutality can solve a problem that otherwise calls for political settlement. However, if and when this or any other government takes to the sea, air and land to invade, to bomb and to forcibly impose its iniquitous will on the Ijaw and on the people of the larger Niger Delta, my guess is that there may be no known bystanders left; no known moderating voices left; and there may be no one left calling for One Nigeria in the region.

It most likely will be the beginning of the end for Nigeria.

As it is, there is a growing voice within the region calling for secession. A military invasion culminating in deaths and destruction, therefore, will only embolden the secessionist movement.

Consider this: would the Yoruba have stood askance if pre and post colonial governments had misappropriated their cocoa farm? Would the Hausa/Fulani have looked the other way if government had exercised undue control over their groundnut pyramids? As for the Igbo, they never would have appreciated it if government had taken over their natural resources in an unfair manner. Awolowo and Ojukwu fought for fairness. Ahmadu Bello and Balewa, too, would never have subscribed to anything that was not in the interest of the Northern interest.

But today, some Nigerians, for the most part, think the Ijaw and other oil_producing communities should just be quiet even in the face of economic injustice, resource theft, environmental degradation, and political exclusion.

A military invasion of the Niger Delta, and especially of Ijaw land, will have several consequences: thousands of innocent men, women and children will die; thousands more will be maimed and displaced; and the region’s environmental problems will be exacerbated. We already have a region -  especially the Riverrine area __ that is vastly underdeveloped, with much of it looking like 18th century Louisiana.

These are the same areas the Yar’Adua government wants to bomb? I wonder if he knows what the Stone Age era looks like. The pain will deepen, the anger will deepen; and vengeance shall not be the Lord’s alone.

The Ijaw and others will most likely extract their pound of flesh. And in this regard, not a single federal infrastructure will be safe; not a single oil pipeline will be safe; and not a single military and or intelligence officer in the region may ever be safe. What’s more, the theater of operation may be expanded to include Abuja and all federal infrastructures in Lagos and elsewhere. It will be tit_for_tat: equivalent retaliation. Of course, Yar’Adua knows when the bombings will begin, but he may never know when it will end. If he opens this can of worms, he may not be the one to close it.

No one disputes the fact that a very small faction of the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) may have gone roguish. No one disputes the fact that a very small section of other justice_seeking groups within the region may have sold out or gone wayward. Still, that does not justify the planned and actual invasion of the region.

What reasonable government and what sane President, bombs his own country simply because he is in search of a few criminals? What sane government spends billions of dollars on the acquisition of military hardware for the sole purpose of destroying his people and his country, when such an amount could have been used for the development of the same region? What doesn’t this President understand about nation_building?

In recent years, at least, six factors have helped to give rise to militancy, and these are: (1) the gross underdevelopment of the region; (2) the sickening environmental condition of the region; (3) the unfair manner in which revenues from oil are allocated, plus the exploitive derivation formula; (4) the unconscionable state of poverty; and (5) the political marginalization of the people; and (6) the socially irresponsible manner in which multinational oil companies operate. But beyond the militancy engendering factors, there are other national problems which deserve urgent attention of which only a Sovereign National Conference can help mitigate and or solve.

And until the aforementioned conditions are properly tackled, no amount of military force will bring about sustainable peace. Whatever peace and security that seem evident the day after the bombing stops, shall be untenable. It will be the worst type of peace ever witnessed in the history of Nigeria.

President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua…what will history say about him? The man who hastened the disintegration process?

14 Responses for “Niger Delta: The impending military assault”

  1. Neil Hamill says:

    It is sad to read of the pending war on the people of the Niger Delta just to satisfy what seems to be such a corrupt Goverment and greedy foriegn interests, like oil. How sad and hurt Our Lord must be to see his children killed and mammed for greed.

  2. Nigereekaz says:

    The path of caputulation is not acceptable, be it the path of (1) comprise and some sort of marriage of convenience with hausa fulani or (2) a genocidal war against niger delta by all other tribes of nigeria, which some northerners already are advocating (because they are callous muslim fanatics anyway):

    You see, most of us who were born after independence did not really understand the politics of tribe as conceptualized by the north. It is becoming clearer or is it? That MEND’s fight is no different from Ojukwu’s stance all along before he was pushed to the declaration of BIAFRA by the 1966 araba ( the slaughter of 30,000 ibos by the north). Yet hear what the hausa fulani said, and still says about BIAFRA. My question is: given that niger-delta backed the north in that war, who has history now vindicated in this quest for fiscal federalism, confederation and mutual respect?

    Gowon and the hausa fulanis (who used and dumped him) massacred 30,000 ibos in the north and yet convinced the rest of nigeria that ibos had an oil agenda and that they were the angels of the polity. Has the JTF not been doing the same thing right in our backyards today? With all the stop and search, treachery and murder, rape of our environment, etc

    If by my own honest adult observations and conclusion, history is on the side of Ibos, why is hausa fulani picking on and showcasing yet another geo-political group ( the niger delta ) and refusing to simply honor our right or at least fix the polity on a plateform of equality for the three regions? Why all this hide and seek and even the talk of islamization by northern hawks? Is there really no grand scheme by the north to actually anihilate niger-delta and take over the oil? (carrying out in practice the very propaganda they sold to niger-delta leaders against Ojukwu and BIAFRA).

    To all niger-deltans. Is it not a political error to not be in special solidarity with tribes who face or faced the type of discrimination we now face? The cunning hausa fulani is busy uniting their forces, including non-hausas to unlease a military assault as reported here. If our cause is so right, who are we in solidarity with? At least some sort of a mutual non-aggression treaty. Do we want a situation where the yorubas or the ibos could be amongst the federal forces fighting our communities, when infact the main obstacle to fiscal federalism all along has been the hausa fulani, by using us one by one against each other.

  3. I believe most of the comments above are fair in the light of the frustrations felt by our people in that region. I will not hastily dismiss the comments of Man Enough. His comments are reasoned and thoughtful. I would urge all parties to show restraint. War has never resulted in anything positive . At the end of the day, there is the victor who wins the war but leaves behind a trail of battles to be resolved, then there is the vanquished who remains bitter, crushed but with his spirit still intact. The govenment will gain nothing by calliing in the tanks to crush a revolution. Point here is that history has shown that such acts though laudable in the beginning have resulted in governments being condemned for acts of genocide. It will be genocide indeed to crush a people because of a few recalcitrant elements. To those who stoke the fires of insurrection and mass disobedience, it is also better to err on the side of caution. The Igbos have not come out in their droves to thank Ojukwu for leading them into a war that could not be won. I am a Deltan and shudder to think that anyone who lived through the era of Biafra wants us to go to war with the Federation. If you asked me to choose between the posturing of Saddam Hussein and the coy “know your enemy and superior ” attidude of Khadaffi, I will go for the later. Much as I respect MEND and commend them for bringing to light the plight of our people, it is high time to start thinking like progressive freedom fighters . The IRA did not win the war against the British government but Shinfein did. Time has come to represent the people as informed and well organised advocates for the rights of the people. We stand to lose our land, our lives not to talk of the attendant collateral damage to our people and our eco-system. Armed as MEND is , I know that they are no march for the fire power of a brutal invasion by the Feds. He who fights and runs away, lives to fight another day!

  4. ARISE ,OH!compatroits of biafra and niger delta republics.

Comments are closed

-->
Home - Back to top^ - Log in - Content, Copyright 2009 - Vanguard Media Limited.